yorkshireclaret

2:06 is the key

Just watched a re-run of the McHugh booking on Morelos. Think our gaffer needs to go to spec savers if he thinks that was a fair challenge. Yellow all day long and its embarrassing for anyone to say otherwise.

quote from our Manager. Stop defending something that was blatant. ""I thought it was a penalty and the letter of the law suggests that he needs to be sent off." McHugh after the booking was lucky to be on the park after committing another foul before giving the penalty away. He should have been taken off. As it was only a matter of time.

I dread to think what Celtic will do in our double header next month. I dont mind dropping points against Celtic, unlike games against Rangers and the others teams that are 6 pointers. But it could serious knock our confidence, especially if we have outfield players that think they are goalkeepers.

he makes his body as big as possible to block a shot. Just like a goalkeeper would do. its a booking all day long. HE IS A STUPID ****

dont mind loosing to Celtic, but must win at home to Aberdeen. A draw would be so so.

exactly dont mind loosing 7 to celtic or aberdeen, but not to that lot. however I hate anyone trying to humour us. Michael Stewart must be the worst pundit ever.

not his fault, mchugh is a hot head anf thinks he is a goal keeper

mchugh for goalkeeper. the flapper know how to block a shot.

orinoco thats embarassing. it was 100% percent a penalty. And if an outfield players pretends to be a goalkeeper with his arms outstretched to make himself as big as possible to block a shot then yes it indeed is a card. McHugh is not the goalkeeper.

In the last 2 years these results happen When we lost 7 to Celtic, I thought well ok Celtic are a good team. And like most prefer them to the other ugly sister. When we lost 7 to Aberdeen I could accept it as Aberdeen were on top of their game. But today. It should have been 10 to Rangers. And we made them look good. Only 1 team should have been tired today. As were the champions at Livi from europe. At the end my entire row had left. I was there taking it from all sides. Thank you Carl. Even left my Bois flag behind.

iF McHigh was doig an impression of a goalkeeper and was a goalkeeper then no pen no card. However he is not a bloody goalkeeeper. He cant go to ground with his arms spread in attempt to block a shot. Its a card all day long. Sportscene are just doing what sportscene does. Causing a debate when there is not 1.

Exactly. Nothing worst than Rangers fans gloating.

Sportscene saying it was not a red or penalty. STOP humouring us. It was a terrible day a the office. McHugh was lucky he was not sent off with challenge in between his yellows. Silly boy and must learn.

mchugh could have been off for his challenge in between 1st yellow and deliberate hand ball. Pathetic. Now I can take a beating like that from Aberdeen or Celtic, but not from them. Gutted. Was looking for the collection bucket at full time to get my money back.

Really enjoyed the Remembrance day show Rangers put on. Made me so proud. Put a few pound in the collection bucket. (thoughts before KO) However what was that regarding performance. Red yes, penalty yes, 7-1 Never!!! Should have been 10! Get it sorted. Not good enough. Our biggest away game of the season and we did not turn up.

shareholders can vote at an agm, or call for an egm if they have enough of a vote, 45% and they can call for a chairman to be removed no problem . And only need 5 % of the remaining 55% to be successful. your deluded.

You seem to not be able to get your head around this. If two celtic shareholders own 45% of a company then to get things passed in a vote they would rely on 5% of the remaining 55% of the vote. Simple answer YES or NO If the answer is YES which any logical assumption would suggest. Then our SPFL Chairman knows he could be out of a very handsomely paid job if he upset these shareholders in his SPFL decisions. GRANTED. they would rely on 5% of the remaining 55%, but would you take that gamble? So please stop with corporate governance and titles, its that simple. There is a conflict of interest.

omg so both celtic directors own 45% of INM but according to you are a minority as EVERYONE else can vote the other 55% Jeez. How cant you agree they are the biggest shareholders in INM and Celtic. If they want to sack our SPFL Chairman because he does something they dont like then they alone are only relying for 5% from 55% of the vote!!! Our SPFL Chairman will do everything he can to hold onto a job at INM where he is paid very handsomely compared to his job in the SPFL Get of your high horse. THERE is conflict of interest and our club is right to note it.

ha ha how can they be minority sharholders as per your reply "If the past Charimen of INM suggested the company should be run to the benefit of two minority shareholders" if they are in fact the largest sharholders??? ;-) Im might not be legally sound but you talk tosh. If you and your friend own 45% of 1 company and 45% of another company. And own the largest shareholdings then you are not minority! Stop using a comparison to sevco Dave King. He is a rogue. We are talking conflict of interest in the SPFL

He is not a non executive. He is the chairman of the company INM and the chairman of the SPFL. Clear conflict of interest. Both Celtic directors owned a combined 45% of INM Past Chairman has suggested INM should be run to suit Dermott Desmond and Dennis Obrien (celtic directors). (https://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/inm-should-be-run-for-denis-o-brien-and-dermot-desmond-1.3463823 INM then employ its new chairman who just happens to be the chairman of the SPFL If you dont think our club is right to think their is a conflict of interest then the game is a bogey. Too make it a bit easier if you have a slight soft spot for the other arse cheek of the great unwashed, imagine Dave King and Douglas Park owning 45% of Media firm and the employing the SPFL Chairman where he is paid MASSIVELY more that his role at the SPFL. Ok I changed the name of the two celtic directors who own roughly 45% of celtic and INM to two Rangers directors, if you tend to swing 1 way.

Anyone else heard the rumour that Doncaster is on his way out at the SPFL? Seems he did not address the board members over possible conflict of interest regarding the new SPFL chairman Murdoch MacLennan and his connections with two Celtic directors in another company. Looks like the press will run the story tomorrow as other clubs including our own at not happy.

let me phrase as simple as I can.

Against Aberdeen was very similar to celtic at Parkhead. We showed we can defend. Against St Johnstone first half was the best I have seen this season. I thought we played some nice stuff. For that reason I believe we will win this Friday. When a manager leaves teams generally lift their game. I think an extra 20% from the players is all that has been misiing in recent weeks. Still think United will score but Henrik is certainly coming into fitness and I will hazard a guess Sutton will put in a shift for a change. 3-1 to the Well!

cant agree! Season after season we have replaced like for like. This season no one replaced Hutchison. O'Brien wages dictates he should be nothing more than a squad player same as Law. We even have squad players holding down Ist team positions due to a limited squad. If for example we were a United or Aberdeen, do you think Sutton, Lasley, McManus would not be dropped? Unfortunate for us they cant be dropped as even when playing at 60% they are still better that anything in our squad. To perform like we have done in past seasons requires a Limited squad giving 100%. Sadly we never saw that this year for McCall.