Great Balls of Shire

SN has had limited game time , any time I've seen him, he's looked decent

He won't be on big money...mind no one wanted to touch him including a lot of our fans and he was a " project" ....quite ironic we are now having this thread...won't work out but let's give guys a chance before we write them off

I'm in the well society and it's all well and good but we are going to be standing still , at best,probably going backwards if we don't get some form of investment ...it's for the fans to decide at some point...if they are aware of the pros and cons ,

After i've spent a few years posting on here, you get to know folks who are posting for a reaction, nothing makes them happy

Apparently all the traffic , buses etc were at a standstill last night because of the bother in town. .how could anybody get worked up enough to fight after watching that poor excuse of a game... apologies for sounding like a daily mail reader ...just go home guys or to the pub, folk going about their business can't be arsed with it all

This is as good a place as any to say what the ws has achieved and going forward ( without investment) what it can achieve..

It's nothing new that fans are treated shoddily , we only fund the game.

I wouldn't want to be a call handler for police on Sunday and listen to all the tedious nonsense...

It's easier to pick holes in everything then when it eventually doesn't work , you can say I was right...

I must admit I hadn't even thought about Dundee Utd, that's where the due diligence would need to be spot on Hopefully we wouldn't be signing forwards on between 4 and 8 k per week...it was ridiculous they were relegated with the wage bill they had.

Good point but with juries, elections , the " facts" are laid out and people choose which way to go, we have no facts at minute, just rumours in a website

But you're always telling us what a poor team/ mgr we have

Well said, my thoughts too. Can you imagine some of the folk on here involved in the negotiating, potential investors would turn and walk away It's all down to the figures, if it's a relatively small investment for relatively small control, I don't see an issue If we want to stand still and probably regress as a team, we can reject ,the wsmodel doesn't work, that fact has been done to death Its fine picking holes in every plan but if there is nothing better out there? Personally mid table or worse isn't very entertaining any more , a lot of people must feel that way, if the attendance is anything to go by

When there is something to know, presumably they will let us know but at minute you're guessing

You've put a question mark , so that's just a guess?

That's my understanding, how much control for that figure? If it's something minimal, is there a great risk? We cant really afford to not consider 300k.

Less money in less risk if things don't work

If this is just conjecture bud, you shouldn't be posting it...your conjecture isn't even joined up thinking

Tbf, that's as bad as I've seen us in a while...Def the worst v st mirren...first 10 mins ok and then couldn't keep the ball in the park

It's Scotland, we are world champion booers...booo

Fair point, suppose he's done a job in the past for Scotland but his confidence must be shot ...give the Scotland fans someone/something else to boo

It was mentioned plenty ..the guy is very rusty and won't play if hickey is fit ..

Welcome to our great wee club, caldy

I've heard this idea before, if check takes more than 30 secs, it's not clear and obvious, original decision stands , var should've been a good thing but they're wasting it. It's only the paying public who aren't been listened to though.

Not in my experience.