Jump to content


SO Well Society Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Brazilian last won the day on November 7 2020

Brazilian had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

744 James McFadden


About Brazilian

  • Rank
    European Footballer of the Year
  • Birthday 12/20/1972

Contact Methods

  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

7,438 profile views
  1. 7 points in the 5 games post split would mean bettering the average achieved in the 28 games to date. with a team that shown almost no fight or desire unless they’re being showcased it’s doable but we need to see the action to improve the tally in the 5 games before the split
  2. It sort of rhymes with Tommy Wright
  3. Killie and manager Dyer part company, another little twist for one of the covid games
  4. And in the management team that replaced him
  5. No - so it would be stupid having admitted to foul and abusive language, for the player or manager to even consider an appeal if that’s reason in ref’s report
  6. Business borrows money all the time to operate especially to fund the systems required for them to function/operate in direct competition with their competitors why should football be any different N.b a lot of our fans seem oblivious that our club do the same thing including accessing this govt loan ( or a similar scheme) which is on hugely preferential terms to some alternative s ps I consider many in football to have lost touch with their privileged position in society at this time, but borrowing money to sustain trading at the level they are practicing currently is just normal business
  7. that fixture was played exactly within the same calendar ‘round of fixtures’ it was originally scheduled. there are plenty of flaws this season including for Celtic, but a Monday night slot was not ‘found’ i had sympathy for the clubs impacted by covid, and still feel for public health reasons it was correct that our games were postponed/ cancelled as it wasn’t clear if the players that would have turned out were covid clear and safe to interact with our players and the officials having read both reports, it’s clear that both clubs didn’t treat the protocols with due respect or even common sense from the govt advice. the punishments handed out were harsh, but at the same time the panel choose to only punish events that the public health bodies felt led directly to the transmission of the virus. as such , the appeal could easily look again at all the breaches, St.Mirren in particular had an appalling list of failings, many of which were noted , but not punished. if this was the case and level of punishment was more balanced, Killie could receive a lesser punishment and St.Mirren probably deserve to be hammered as they truly did not implement the required controls almost mocking the seriousness of the situation.
  8. Surely we could petition the SFA not to register a player unless the development compensation is paid
  9. lets hope he is getting close, if he's getting further away ... i had kinda hoped to be there, like Mio's , but for the lad he deserves any small reward for his attitude and efforts
  10. Another point on board, scraping together enough for now although we’ll be looking at others to drop points to be safe
  11. This is Robinson biggest failing, sees something in players that even the players don’t seem to know about
  12. The SFA website? Only protocols ? So not in the SPFL rules and regulations then? PS, I’m being a bit facetious , everyone has their own conclusions’ most’ made without the ‘silly’ little details that could influence outcome and most all made with a hint of bias I thought they were harshly punished in a public health pandemic, same as hearts, thistle etc, doesn’t mean I want it changed.
  13. maybe we should just play football when we can, rack up or scrape points as our capability allows , and let the process run , its course plenty of scope for discussion without losing the rag, we were in a false league position on league match performance, as much as , what, if, but allows for , even head to head recent history with squads shows we benefitted I'm not sure about 'blatant' rule breaches ..... when nobody is giving clear indication, if they are steadfast incorporated 'rules' or guidance to continue operate as a league that clubs agreed to , even as much as common sense applies, if they are solid rules , broken with legitimate punishment given, then that punishment usually stands , ideal , if not , then play fixtures? alternatives if punishment handed out is deemed excessive? points deductions? or score draws? I'm also wary of demanding financial compensation for 'rule' breaches , when our own club has a history littered with call offs having failed to meet the requirements of the rules and regulations , no difference if it is covid 'rules' or playing surface rules , floodlight rules etc , IF it's a rule break leading to a fixture not being played to the original schedule, to then financially compensate the other club would be an awful precedent set

Twitter @MotherwellFC