Jump to content

Brazilian

SO Well Society Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,807

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Brazilian

  12. Queen of the South game

    in Club Chat

    Posted

    Feed is At least 3 minutes behind but running ok for now 

    Motherwell v Queen of the South

    Motherwell starting XI: Kelly, S. O'Donnell, Carroll, Lamie, O'Connor, Maguire, Donnelly, Cornelius, Lawless, Van Veen, Watt

    subs: Fox , Woolery, Amaluzor, McGinley, Crawford, Parker, Johnston, C.O’Donnell, Wilson

     

  13. Fans back into stadiums

    in Club Chat

    Posted

    17 hours ago, Kmcalpin said:

    I'm sure you're right. However questions need to be asked of the guidance if different local authorities differ in their decisions regarding very similar situations. 

    But they don’t differ?  
    the chat started with the clown claiming it was an non-government party led authority offering different allowances, ignoring we are in an authority controlled by parties not in government ,

    then an insight  of the many factors was offered and it’s clear it’s nothing to do with clarity or political affiliation in the authority , it’s simply complex with many variables in a changing environment .

    the biggest factor possibly being the authority having to consider everything that’s happening within its boundaries not just one event.

    non football people will be amazed at what’s being permitted to date 

     

  15. Season 2020’21: Game 28: Hamilton (H)

    in Club Chat

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Ya Bezzer! said:

    This.

    Going to be a similar situation as when Robinson took over from McGhee and it went to the bottom six split matches.

    If we can take 5 points from the games leading up to the split that would leave us looking for 7 points post split.

    Doable but still a bit nerve wracking.  Would be a good time to break the Accies hoodoo though!

    7 points in the 5 games post split would mean bettering the average achieved in the 28 games to date.

    with a team that shown almost no fight or desire unless they’re being showcased 

    it’s doable but we need to see the action to improve the tally in the 5 games before the split 

     

     

  19. Season 2020’21: Game 23: Aberdeen (A)

    in Club Chat

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Kmcalpin said:

    GA saying we may appeal depending whats in the ref's report. He says Polworth did swear but at the Aberdeen player not the ref. Does that make any difference?

    No - so it would be stupid having admitted to foul and abusive language, for the player or manager to even consider an appeal if that’s reason in ref’s report

  20. Killle £1m bailout Vs Astute Management

    in Club Chat

    Posted

    Business borrows money all the time to operate 

    especially to fund the systems required for them to function/operate in direct competition with their competitors  

    why should football be any different 

    N.b a lot of our fans seem oblivious that our club do the same thing including accessing this govt loan ( or a  similar scheme) which is on hugely preferential terms to  some alternative s

    ps I consider many in football to have lost touch with their privileged position in society at this time, but borrowing money to sustain trading at the level they are practicing currently is just normal business 

     

    • Like 1

  21. Season 2020’21: Game 30: St Mirren (A)

    in Club Chat

    Posted

    22 minutes ago, CoF said:

    The initial decision reasoning put a lot of weight on the fact that postponing games is simply not an option this season. The SPFL found Celtic a Monday night slot because they wanted to do some extra training / rest some players, so there's that argument gone. 

    that fixture was played exactly within the same calendar  ‘round of fixtures’ it was originally scheduled.

    there are plenty of flaws this season including for Celtic,  but a Monday night slot was not ‘found’ 

    i had sympathy for the clubs impacted by covid, and still feel for public health reasons it was correct that our games were postponed/ cancelled as it wasn’t clear if the players that would have turned out were covid clear and safe to interact with our players and the officials 

    having read both reports, it’s clear that both clubs didn’t treat the protocols with due respect or even common sense  from the govt advice.

    the punishments handed out were harsh, but at the same time the panel choose to only punish events that the public health bodies felt led directly to the transmission of the virus.

    as such , the appeal could easily look again at all the breaches, St.Mirren in particular had an appalling list of failings, many of which were noted , but not punished.

    if this was the case and level of punishment was more balanced, Killie could receive a lesser punishment and St.Mirren probably deserve to be hammered as they truly did not implement the required controls almost mocking the seriousness of the situation.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...