Jump to content

fizoxy

The Great Rebuild 2017'18

Recommended Posts

If the issue with Tait is long term, Grimshaw could be an option for the right wing-back role.

 

I thought he did well playing on the right when he was here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was quite impreesed by him although he's no world beater. I seem to recall he was a real worker with a competitive spirit and was able to play at full back as well.

 

 

He stood at full-back, aye, but he was never a full-back. I think it was against Thistle? He spent the entire time with his head spinning around trying to figure out where he was meant to be.

 

He did fine, and offered a bit of graft in a team that was lacking in that. Provided an assist against Accies, but all in all, I felt he offered little in terms of football. Ran around a lot and dived into tackles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was quite impreesed by him although he's no world beater. I seem to recall he was a real worker with a competitive spirit and was able to play at full back as well.

Played on the right side of midfield too. Seems like a good signing to me, was impressed by him when he was here and he offers cover in several positions. Think also the fact that he and his dad are members of the Well Society, goes some way into telling us how much he enjoyed his time here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't say I blame them - it looks as though they've just made a huge profit from a similar approach to us this time last year.

 

Hopefully Cadden doesn't throw his toys out of the pram in the same way Marvin did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surly if Caddens development fee will be £600k (or there about) when his contract runs out, it wouldn't make sense for us to sell him for any less than this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cadden brings so much to our game and is a magnificent out ball who's runs are so much a part of our attacking play. if any player is sold he is the one I think we will miss the most. His workrate is phenomenol.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cadden brings so much to our game and is a magnificent out ball who's runs are so much a part of our attacking play. if any player is sold he is the one I think we will miss the most. His workrate is phenomenol.

He's the one we would miss the most and he's the one we can ask the largest fee for. All points to a deal being unlikely unless we get a ridiculous bid. Wouldn't rule out Forest testing us though if they can't get McGinn...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's the one we would miss the most and he's the one we can ask the largest fee for. All points to a deal being unlikely unless we get a ridiculous bid.

Absolutely. We don't need to sell him at this stage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surly if Caddens development fee will be £600k (or there about) when his contract runs out, it wouldn't make sense for us to sell him for any less than this.

It's only £600k if he ends up in the English premiership or chamipionship as far as I'm aware. Anywhere else and it could be a good bit less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankfully we hold all the cards when it comes to Oxford bidding for Cadden; we know they're just about come into a wedge of cash, we don't need to sell because of the Marv sell on, he has a couple of years left on his contract and our worst case scenario is £600k as a development fee. Not to mention he's a key player and a huge part of how we play.

 

Offers in excess of £1m plus adds on's before we even pick up the phone.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surly if Caddens development fee will be £600k (or there about) when his contract runs out, it wouldn't make sense for us to sell him for any less than this.

 

Only if he goes to Championship level or above is it not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see oxford offered 170k which was rightfully knocked back, are they that stupid

 

Where's this from? :lol:

 

That's a nonsense like, what an absolutely tinpot operation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we can keep him for 2 seasons and if then leaves get a 600K development fee and they want us to let him go for 170K .He is worth more staying and hopefully he will

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Sky we have accepted a bid for Heneghan from Blackburn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was quite impreesed by him although he's no world beater. I seem to recall he was a real worker with a competitive spirit and was able to play at full back as well.

If true about Grimshaw, I would expect him to play right wing back but also offers a degree of versatility in being able to play in midfield also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Where's this from? :lol:

 

That's a nonsense like, what an absolutely tinpot operation.

 

That moron agentscotland on Twitter. Also said we would deal at 350k. That'll be deleted shortly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That moron agentscotland on Twitter. Also said we would deal at 350k. That'll be deleted shortly.

ahh right didnt know that source was a nut job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to sky weve turned down 450k from oxford for cadds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12:35

WELL REBUFF OXFORD BID

 

Sky sources understand Motherwell have rejected a bid in the region of £450,000 from Oxford United for midfielder Chris Cadden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also rangers interested in Ross McCormack aye like they could afford him

That's also been rebuffed...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Twitter @MotherwellFC

×