Jump to content

StAndrew7

Legends
  • Posts

    903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

StAndrew7 last won the day on February 22

StAndrew7 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About StAndrew7

  • Birthday 09/18/1987

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

StAndrew7's Achievements

First Team Regular

First Team Regular (6/10)

101

Reputation

  1. Apart from the interviews that took place in February as discussed at the AGM, aye? Shut yer hole.
  2. Don't forget that we report it the day after as well. Occasionally with a hospital bed selfie.
  3. No VAR in the Championship, that's how. 😅
  4. Considering he's already been capped by and scored for Canada, sadly not.
  5. I for one am absolutely loving the seethe from Rangers fans this morning over Casey's tackle. Their wee boy got hurt by that big bad man and and and and that's just not fair. Also, the fact they are conveniently ignoring the fact that McCausland got injured because he shat out the tackle and left his leg straight (which also planted high on Casey's leg 🙄🙃)... makes it all the more wonderful. 😁
  6. I think the point is that we don't know and it'd be good to get clarity on that. Even if it is something that can be assumed as being the case, if it's not confirmed, or states "of those eligible to vote" in the e-mail, it's not clear. I haven't got the e-mail as I'm not in the WS, so if anyone can confirm the wording that'd be ideal.
  7. Aye, fair point. If 1,000 members weren't able to vote because they're junior members, that does change things somewhat.
  8. I get that, but my point isn't about the vote that's just happened. That is done and dusted and valid and it should be honoured. My point is about my concerns with any future vote regarding the future of the club and any sale to an outside investor; if less than 50% of the Well Society vote in any poll regarding the sale of shares, or purchase of or whatever, does that in any way constitute a majority of the membership? Would the WS Board then need to put into action the results of a vote which regards anything from the sale of the club, sale of some of the WS stake, or agreeing to outside investment and does that, in corporate law/takeover requirements, constitute a valid vote to support any legal requirements to be able to vote as a block of 72% of the club. Sorry that's a bit of a word salad but I'm typing quickly before having to jump into a meeting.
  9. Aye, that's what I was hoping for/mentioned later in my post. I really hope it does. Like, how can the WS Board vote its 72% block of shares with less than 50% of the membership voting? That's not a realistic majority for something as crucial as the sale of the club.
  10. Whoever ran/set up the poll in whatever package (I assume SurveyMonkey or the like) should have all that data available; delivery success, open rates, link clicks, all of it should be there.
  11. People do realise that this is just a vote to consider proposals which give up fan ownership, right? Like, there will be another vote for all of the club's shareholders, including the society and private shareholders for or against any proposed takeover? Granted, the WS holds the majority by a long distance and it will vote as a block, but still. This isn't a done deal, at all. This might, in a way, galvanize those that didn't vote to sit up and take notice. I hope it does. And before any chirps up, I will always vote against any proposal that gives up fan ownership (for the record, I'm a private shareholder, not a WS member. Yet.) The turnout is appalling, frankly. That speaks to a few things, I guess. The question was ambiguous, people who didn't get the e-mail not requesting one, apathy in general, the quick nature of the turnaround etc. etc. You'd have to think that if we do get to the stage of there being a proposed investment, that there would need to be a certain level of turnout for the Well Society Board to be able to say that it truly represents the feelings of its members?
  12. With Livi going, I assume that means a vote can be forced at 11-1 or even 12-0 in favour to rule them out of the Premiership forevermore if Killie are getting rid anyway?
  13. I'm not sure Nicholson will start in a game like this; we need Davor's bite/covering in the middle against Rangers. Nicholson did well on Wednesday night but I think he'll come off the bench, probably for Vale.
  14. Shitting bricks big man, eh? Don't worry, we'll always feed you first. There's rumours about him and another of Livi's strikers; Yengi, maybe? Nothing concrete that anyone can confirm or deny.
  15. Lol steelboy will never change that tune. Ever.
×
×
  • Create New...