Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/25/2018 in Posts

  1. I think that was the highlight for the boys on the Mixlr commentary too.
    2 points
  2. But he's right, at least in part. Mud sticks so easily in football that when the claim is made that we're just long ball merchants some folk will accept it without a second thought. Like last season we were the dirtiest bastards in the league because Rangers lost to us and spat the dummy backed up by Brendan Rodgers seeing an opportunity to put ideas into referees heads and suddenly you've all and sundry wailing for non-existent fouls and arseholes like Neil Lennon screaming about protecting McGinn against us when the wee dick had spent the full game kicking anyone that moved in claret and amber. Absolutely there are Motherwell fans out there who will genuinely believe our game is hoofball 100% of the time. Heard and seen it repeated often enough that every long ball they see just reinforces what they've come to believe is the case and are now becoming blind to what is actually the case. Do we utilise the long ball? Yes we do. Overly so at times when what is actually our primary tactic of getting the ball crossed in from wide areas isn't working. And when done too often it is unquestionably to our detriment such as Saturday past. But some would have you believe this is our only tactic but that's just not the case. How did we manage to score our first last night if we're just a long ball side? That's not entirely uncommon, Cadden did much the same the previous week too. How did we come to end up we having Frear, who missed however many games, being the player who put most crosses into the box last season if all we do is put long balls up the park? How does Tait seem to get as many assists if all we do is punt long balls? Now you can certainly question the aesthetics of primarily wanting to get balls into the box from wide areas and you can perfectly justifiably make a claim that a quick tempo possession based style that moves the ball on the ground at speed can offer more entertainment value but If you genuinely believe that the only thing Motherwell offer is hoof-ball then I'd agree you're following a particular flock rather acknowledging we have more than a single way of playing the game.
    1 point
  3. It's great how people see things differently. I thought Rose was excellent last night doing the job in front of the back three that McHugh did last season without being caught in possession and giving the ball away regularly.
    1 point
  4. For as much as I wasn't overly excited about the Sammon signing having watched him regularly at Sheffield United (although acknowledging new club/fresh start...and he's proving that to be the right approach), I'd say anyone that had the opinion that he's slow has never actually watched or paid attention to him...or is just repeating rhetoric. He's absolutely rapid on a Charlie Dunne level, and always has been.
    1 point
  5. Must admit I was very impressed with ATS when he came on looks a player.
    1 point
  6. Recorded shortly after the full-time whistle in ‘Well’s 2-0 win over Queen of the South, Ben Banks and Joe McKelvie join Sparra to discuss Motherwell’s opening three matches in the Betfred League Cup group stages, look ahead to the final group fixture against Clyde, consider the appointment of Peter Hartley as new club captain, debate the signing of Connor Sammon and much more. http://www.mfc1886.com/mfc-podcast-2018-19-episode-2/
    1 point
  7. The season before we were unseeded at Parkhead. If you run on the park there you end up in a cell. Definitely an advantage.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00
×
×
  • Create New...