Merely pointed out you were incorrect in suggesting our downturn was due to losing our top scorer in January. Or am I misreading the above comment.
We have scored as many goals in the games since Watt left as we did in that same number of games immediately before he left. And created as many chances. You failed to respond to that fact and instead seem to be yet again using Watt's departure to deflect from how poor Alexander has been in the past four months, if not before when points gained offset some awful outings. Teams, even poor teams, worked out how to negate our one dimensional approach and until Saturday Alexander showed no willingness or ability to try anything different. He did adapt on Saturday and in my opinion it was our best performance in months. Still a defeat, but this time a defeat that was not deserved.
Oh and just to emphasise why top six should be a minimum expectation and not the Holy Grail, the last time your projected top 6 worked out as you suggested, in any order, looks to have been 1991-92. So history does not support that reasoning either.
Watt's departure is not the major reason we have failed to turn up for most matches since he left.