David MFC
-
Posts
212 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by David MFC
-
-
or maybee our new striker is russel brand
he always seems to score a s**tload ...
scored more than the whole rangers team of last season ,, including alan mcgregor
-
think its safe to say that we won't havr this striker in for tonight/tomorrow
? -
We don't need no MDMA,
We don't need no speed or crack,
No puffing the herb or chasing the dragon,
No LSD, or pills, or smack,
Hey,
Pablo,
We've got Giles Coke.
(to the tune of "Another Brick In The Wall", if there's anyone on the planet who didn't realise that).
has to be the best one yet !!
would be great to hear it tomorrow
-
Stuart Elliot?
or maybee callum
-
I prefer players getting hooked after 45 rather than 85 when its to late
brings back mcghee memories
thats if he even made a sub when we were playing pishh ...
-
just a thought .. but did gannon not make mention in the paper last week about something about if you want to see hard tackles and shots from 30 yards .. to go and watch the rugby ?
think he opened his mouth a bit early
cause there was the fair share of hard tackles frm the boys today .. and as for goals from 30 yards.. by the end of the season we will have a dvd full of them
!! -
few stand outs todayy.
but coke did it for me.
this guy looks a real prospect for me, solid midfielder who is composed on the ball under pressure.
well done big man.
-
It's possible, though I don't know this for certain, that the number 10 shirt will not be reallocated.
me and myy old man were talkin about this the other day.
i would be very surprised if they rellocate the number 10 jersey.
this would be a tough number for a player to walk into.
however we shall just need to wait and see .... gannon might sign that many players over the coming days he wont have enough squad numbers
... if onlyy -
i think we are readingg far to much intoo this to be honnest.
remember everyone jumped to the conclusion that after craggs whole hearted wave after the llanelli awayy game they thought he was off ?
this is just the samee thing, people having nothin better to do on a saturdayy night than read to far intoo things.
he was subbed as the way gannon set the team out to play in the first half was all wrong. sutton was a no-body agains st johnsons two centre halfs, they were bossin him, so gannon corectly changed it to a wayy that did'nt suit them ... byy taking of craggs and putting reynolds into his more suited centre back position and brought on young mchugh who looked to be a real handfull.
i don't think that this is the end for craggs, his experience is priceless and i think people are just looking into it far too much.
-
7 of us .. leaving shortly
'MON THE 'WELL !!
-
yyy oh yyy oh yyyy?!?
?
-
Exhibit (B) M'Lud
This is the question i meant, no havin a go mate, jus you had us sitting expecantly!!!
musta missed that one lol !! must have not pressed refresh in time
its just did someone not submit a posr yerterdayy sayin the JG hoped to have a striker in byy the weekend ?
sorryyy for giving a false feeling of expectation guyss !! myy bad
-
Exhibit (A) M'Lud, suggesting inside knowledge no?? Then you ducked the question when somebody asked
inside knowledgee
no wayy.an never duked the question .. infact what question DelBoyd
? -
Well it was you who said we had a striker to sign tonight!!!!!
no no no ... i said i had a feeling that one was going to be signed today. but looks like i was wrong (:
-
this threads went awfully quiet
-
No way. . . . . . i was just about to edit the post
-
was it reallly necisarry for this thread
afterall... all the discussions are in the canterbury thread !
-
"The strip is available to view, in person, at the 'Well shop where you can also pre-order."
-
i would say there is to be a striker comfirmed by todayy
-
fantastic effort from caterbury
l love it
i will be buyin that for defoo's
-
wayyy before myy time of being a motherwell fan, however ...
RIP budddy
-
1-0 Motherwell.
-----------------------------------------Ruddy
------------------------------Hutchison---------Craigan
O'Brien--------------------------------Reynolds---------------------Hammell
-----------------------Forbes-----------------Coke----------------------------
Murphy-----------------------Sutton-----------------------------Slane
That team looks shit hot in my book.
O'Brien and Murphy playin WIDE FUCKIN RIGHT or they just sittin on the bench
? -
better than Saunders or anyone else we've tried there.
i have to disagree here mate.
though o'brien did well at right back, he done well going down the right wing, however his inability to tackle without givivng awayy dafts fouls could screw us !!
i think saunders would be the best option at right back.. unless we sign a better player, but unil then, young saunders gets myy vote for right back
-
Tom Hately, on ofishul site.
next ....
In's And Out's
in Club Chat
Posted
think they went back on monday