steelboy

i got one in today.

here's what weescas posted.... bradford - 500,000 people. 12,000 season tickets huddersfield - 146,000 people.16,000 season tickets hartlepool - 90,000 people. 4,000 season tickets motherwell 30,000 people. 3000 season tickets for us to do one of these offers we'd need to have every single person who attended the rangers semi buying a season ticket, never going to happen.

do you think our failure to score at home could be at all connected to the fact we continually pass the ball out wide to humphrey and he hasn't set up a goal so far season?

tell them i'll give them 20 n64 games for nowt if they let me do the challenge tomorrow.

can you do this without a facebook?

do you think they are high diving scrooge mcduck style into pools of cash? VAT got bumped up by 2.5 percent but ticket prices stayed steady, that's a net loss for the club. inflation is at 4% yet the price to pay into the east stand has been the same for years. every penny counts at fir park, we spend £1.8 million a year on player wages directly competing against english teams. does anyone want to see that reduced?

you can already pay 15 quid a game by getting a season ticket. anyone who wants a price cut should also identify where the club should reduce their spending by the same amount.

i don't agree with all the posts blaming the weather. i've seen us play well in rain, snow and high winds before. the weather today was relatively mild, we could have done better. hitting high balls for the first 45 minutes was insane.

randolph

how many years is it expetced to last?

we didn't commit enough men forward to score, their keeper made one save. at the other end randy made a few and we were lucky with their poor finishing. the first half tactics were beyond belief but we were much better in the 2nd. mccall needs to think about how to make us more dangerous going forward, we've rode our lucky recently without creating many chances. 3 goals in 6 home games is pathetic.

i heard it cost 12 grand. it looks like something that should be stuck on the side of the mega bar or the palace, not a fitting tribute to a much loved and much missed legend imo.

were you at pittodrie on saturday? standing was not prohibited. certain people, standing at certain times was prohibited. in fact if you go to any game you will always see people standing for the entire duration.

i'd play the same team but with murphy playing left mid and law on the right. get right in about their fullbacks.

their rules say 'standing in a seated area is strictly prohibited' which is completely untrue.

the dortmund fans are bouncing like maniacs at the emirates. some better tell them it's against the law

you can't apply a law properly or improperly you can only apply it or not apply it. and that situation may not arise but why pass a law that means it is possible? seems a bit stupid to me.

what's the benefit in that for the club?

i still think we need some wee tweaks up front. we're winning games by the thinnest margins at the moment and we're not creating many chances other than via tom hateley's crossing. the away games have been great but we have carried a fair bit of luck (long may it continue) and we're not scoring at home. for me mccall has to figure out how to get more out of murphy, he put in a good shift in midfield on saturday but he's wasted playing so deep. i was expecting big things from him linking up with nicky law this season but they haven't really gelled and seem to take up each other's space. i'd play them out wide on either side of higdon with omar playing behind or hughes in centre mid. we need to get jamie firing on all cylinders as we badly need his goals and a good transfer fee in the summer.

taken to task for actually applying a law? that's a good one. you are stickin up for the bill while actually saying we don't need it. following your logic why don't we just give the police the right to arrest and imprison anyone at whim then trust their judgement to apply it correctly? do you actually believe it is fair that two people travelling on a bus shout the same 'offensive' sloan and one gets dealt with more harshly than the other because his offence is aggravated by travelling to the football? there is no justice in that.

4th place is guaranteed europe. over the past five seasons the amount of points needed to secure 4th has been 50, 54, 53, 53 and 56. there are only 8 points seperating 4th to 12th now suggesting that between those clubs anyone can beat anyone. there isn't a side like gretna, falkirk or accies that everyone will gub and no one below us looks capable of hitting a great bit of form. dundee united look the most likely to me to go on a good run but i can't see two sides managing it. if we win 3 of the next 6 we will have 38 points making it likely that 15 points in the new year will see us into europe. due to the parity between the bottom 9 i can't see the total number of points needed to get 4th being higher than usual.

i said after the celtic game that it would be great to go into the new year with 38 points so i'd be happy with 3 wins. i don't think we'll lose 3 games however. 50 points should be good enough for europe this season as it seems anyone can beat anyone in the bottom 9 so i can't see any side going on a great run. it's incredible to think we could have it wrapped it up before winter is over.

i knew he'd score goals, i siad it earlier in the the thread. we're winning now because of the midfield and defence. in our last two away games the opposing keeper hasn't made a save.

he played well yesterday and he worked a loty harder. if he showed the same application from yesterdaya and the inverness game from the start of the season this thread wouldn't exist. i still don't rate him though, if we had a clarkson or jutkiewic this season we would be demolishing teams.

are you sending the emails in a daft font with 12 point claret lettering?