steelboy

i don't see why that would be the case. reynolds would play on the left side and hutchy would be the first candidate to play on the right. hutchy has signed a new deal and getting a healthy fee for him should be a target for us. i don't think mccall would hesitate to start with reynolds and hutchy, he has left out craigan when it was the right thing to do on a few occasions before. our defence was rock solid for most of 2009 and 2010 then since reynolds left it hasn't been up to the same standards. to suggest we're stronger now when all we have is the exact same players as a year ago minus reynolds and craigan a year older is a strange statement.

i'm going to out on a limb here and suggest we might start more than one centrehalf in most games next season.

it's not like we were handing out debuts in defence after the semi and if we still had reynolds we wouldn't have had to watch gunning's comedy capers. reynolds and hutchy would be a superb combo. left footer/right footer, one who attacks the ball and one who sweeps, both of them have pace. i still think craggs can do a job for us next season but playing every week on the left side of the CH pairing? not sure.

as i was saying i don't think he is the most sought after guy. he seems to have burned a lot of bridges down south by storming out the county ground.

there's no chance that reynolds would get half the wage he is on at wednesday anywhere in the spl. i think he'll hang about for a while as he'll know that if he does that he'll be set financially and even if he barely kicks a ball in the next two years he can always come back to fir park then. to me wednesday look to be up shit creek. they spent big hoping to bounce straight back to the championship and missed by miles. now they are owned by the grim reaper of fitba milan mandaric and unless they can't massively chop the wage bill they will start running up debt again. no reason for marky to worry though as the pfa guarantees wages even if a club goes tits up.

we didn't lose 3 goals away to ict, killie and hearts and 4 away to united becuase we were playing cavalier football. we lost them because of piss poor defending.

with reynolds last season we playeed 28 games and conceded 29 goals. without reynolds we played 25 games and conceded 43 goals. we definitely missed reynolds when he left last season. him and hutchy would be a superb pairing.

the guy is a striker who has scored 5 goals in 3 seasons and didn't do himself any favours with at swindon with his performances or walking out on them. i think he'd probably be within our price range.

just jump on a bus with all the celtic fans

what games? as i remember it it was hughes who was the driving force in the three vital wins over hibs, celtic and aberdeeen that secured europe for us. i honestly think that people who wouldn't take him are mental. it would bring murphy on leaps and bounds as he would be able to concentrate on getting in dangerous areas rather than taking the ball off hammell 40 yards out and trying to make somthing happen from nothing.

i can't believe there is even a debate about this. some of hughes' performances were total class. think about winning at celtic park, the brazil and real madrid wins at easter road, the three draws against the h**s at fir park, him and clarky putting our season back on track against hibs on a mud heap, the 2nd half in the snow at tynecastle, wrapping up europe against the sheep, even the bottom six wins at paisley and hamilton and most of all the total football wins over the sheep and united in dec 07. the guy is only 28 and when he is on top of his game he had the sort of quality we very rarely see in a motherwell top. i also think that humphrey, hateley and especially murphy would benefit from playing with him and it might even bring on carswell and mchugh tae.

i'd be delighted to get hughes back. he was pulling the strings when we were playing the best fitba i've ever seen us play so i think if we get him back we can at least be confident we'll be decent to watch next season. he struggled in the first half of his second season but i thought he came back strongly in the second half from when we kicked off the unbeaten run.

the tims would be up in arms if their jakey pin up was sent out to another spl club. it'll be paddy's usual season. 4000 snout, 600 pints, 12 sub appearances, 5 starts and half a bar of soap.

no.

scott cuthbert is shite. he didn't just relegated from league one for nothing. it's incredible how swindon managed to get relegated with 5 former celtic youth superstars in their squad.

we've always had better strikers than sutton! clarky, porter, mcdonald, mcfadden, goodman, spencer, mcculloch, coyle, coyne and arnott all superior players in my well supporting career. good move bringing in higdon. we pretty much know what we're going to get and he gives us an option to go long if need be. it'll be a test for mccall to keep him fit and motivated but if he is i think he will compliment humphrey and murphy well. we've had 3 strikers in double figures for each of the past 4 seasons and i'm sure higdon will manage at least that. our midfielders always seem to have an aversion to shooting but the flipside of that is that we create plenty for the forward line. i also think we'll be worrying some teams from set plays next season if we're sending up higdon, hutchy and saunders to meet hateley's dead balls.

you would love it if he came back. you've cleary missed him

he played for queens park amatuers in the scottish final against eddlewood before joining us so i don't think he was ever properly signed with the third division mob.

gerard murphy - the year of the disapearnaces they managed to half the protestant population of the RoI in about 20 years. sounds like ethnic cleansing to me. our you can read about the kingsmill massacre where they stopped a van full of catholics and protestants going home from nightshift and proceeded to let the catholics go and murder the protestants. seems a bit sectarian if you ask me.

big tel. 3 semis, a final and two top six finishes. 02/03 - we were lucky to have a club and were always going to finish bottom. at least we had some great highs beating hearts 6-1 and doing the old firm double. the scottish run that season was a belter as well. 03/04 - faddy leaves in august. pearo leaves in january. doesn't matter we get the top six anyway. there was a brilliant feel good factor that season topped off by claret and amber day at tynecastle. 04/05 - we played some cracking football, got the top six and the cis final. the final was a disapointment but we bounced back and got skippy sunday. 05/06 - bottom six but still a pretty good season with all the high scoring games at the start and a cis semi against celtic. it peetered out a bit after that but it was still a decent season. for me that beats mcghee's one brilliant season hands down.

if we do have a few decent wages to give out a striker and a left mid should be the priority. hateley was poor in centremid this season but he was much better in the games he played with las than with jenno. hopefully after a decent summer break tom will find his form again.

for me the biggest disapointment was the fannying about with the defence at the end of the season. we started eight different combinations of back 4 in our final eight games, that's ridiculous. we haven't really recovered from losing reynolds and we've the amount of goals we have shipped in 2011 compared to 2010 has been shocking. taking hammell out of the defence was a massive mistake. mccall can send out as many emails as he wants but the truth is he made an arse of it. the atmosphere was pretty pish as well. the next time we make a final we'd be better only taking 7000 tickets.

the bulk of the shareholding will be in the hands of the people in the mutual society.

thats not how it will work. boyle won't be directly selling his shares. the mutual company will retain the shareholding and we will buy into that. there will be a set price for a buy in and if 500 people choose to buy in there will 500 shares and 500 equal votes. if 1000 people choose to buy in then it will have 1000 shares and 1000 equal votes. i don't think they will be looking to raise a great deal of capital with this. the club will continue to be self sufficient.

i think it will be closer to 100 than 1000. i think they will be looking to get a couple of thousand people to buy in which will make it easier for the board to operate than if it was only a few hundred.