Onthefringes

Very much so. Transport links are generally improved when there’s appetite to do so by key stakeholders. Still, question was asked on how others view redeveloping our current home.

For those who favour a notion of redeveloping current home - yet to see anything tangible offered, how would you view redevelopment? Footprint is prohibitive, future access will be restricted as the periphery ring road eventually takes shape are just two examples for consideration.

Some mental gymnastics that.

There’s a few posting on this thread won’t be convinced otherwise…

The information is there, don’t even have to scrape the surface for it… I’m not a member of any part of the associated groups of that end section.

The ‘Bois’ are about two dozen in number… Expand your mind, your brain may follow.

Eh? Absolutely not and not the point I was making… An upturn in self policing is never more required. They don’t? It’s their own funeral.

Ridiculous closing statement. There are plenty in our support who would put that idea to bed and they know it.

Misleading headline only serves to get the usual suspects excited. The action was wrong and there is no excusing that - to label one group of fans again, the lack of understanding of the make up of that section is bizarre. The fine for standing in the aisles wasn’t Block E either. surprised the statement was released given the club have disputed the value claimed.

Dismissing the question as it’s a nonsense. Your closing gambit isn’t for dispute.

Not disagreeing. Wasn’t the point being made though…

‘They’ weren’t the first or only section of the support who made it onto pitchside last night. Not that it’ll suit the narrative being peddled.

Agreed. I defended his ‘building incrementally’ statement a few weeks ago a statement that looks to have been naive. This takes time, comfortable in those at the helm to trust the process.

They could be if Longelo is around long enough…

Can we say that on here?