superward

Why? Based on what?

I would like this to happen. Yes.

Thats true. Carry out for the train then while you wait for the 39 minutes paat to make up for the lost 20mins!

Are you sure? Looks like a normal Thursday service to me. Argyle st is 5 mins walk from central so its not that far. Thats where I will be getting the train from too.

Even more trains are running between Glasgow and the towns outwith so I am sure you will be fine!!

Haha. True.

To play devil's advocate we also should have had another 3 - Carswell and Sutton shots should have been stuck away. Vigurs goal should have stood as he was not offside but Sutton, an inactive player was. In fact, McManus could have scored too if not for a great save and Ramsdem claims a penalty. So thats 4 maybe 5 goals we were a whisker away from too!

He clearly got fouled and pushed under the ball. Or are we just ignoring that aye?

I went for Law but I thought Vigurs had a good game. He had obviously been given the remit to rake about and it was clear both him and Ainsworth were told to attack rather than track back - I even seen McCall tell him so in the first half ( I sit about 8 rows behind the dugout).

Saying we need a new back 4 is pushing it. Another centre half wouldnt go a miss though. Left winger, agree. Centre mid though?Nah, think we are fine there. By god do we need a wee tricky striker though.

Behave...

Disagree Yoshi...Dan didnt have much at all to do except pick the ball out the net at two penalties. Apart from that he made the blocks he needed too and got fouled at the one cross he fumbled. Agree the defence looked lazy. Midfield - Thought Vigurs had a good game, was running rings round them and set up a goal. He lost the ball a couple of times at the end but overall good. Law had a great first 45. Carswell was solid. Ainsworth a good first 45. Lasley had a shocker for an experienced player. Countless missed passes and he did move his hand to the ball for the first pen. Sutton - Mingin but no service

For me it's either Sutton or Higdon - our budget can't afford both. If we had all the money in the world then maybe you could have both in your squad with only 1 starting and the other providing competition but that wont happen.

What bookies? I want in on that

Yep, that's exactly what the lad in front of me did last year and year before and he was fine. It's amazing what speaking to someone can rather than just reading it on the internet.

YAS!

There were comments on Twitter by Flow, in a conversation to someone else, during the summer about the TV product going free to air (not sure if its all of it ot certain things) on Youtube. Change of strategy I assume and must drive better benefits than the subscription model. That said, the current subscribers should probably be told that or expect a refund.

Aye, its in the YouTube press conf video.

Yep agreed, its the full thing - time of year, unknown opposition, slightly high prices. I'll be there

Ah good, glad to see you weren't really basing it anything then... Anyway, wee Stu in the press conference just there saying it is purely training facilities for Pearson and he has somewhere set up to go to at the weekend. He also mentioned thatthere were a couple of people we had interest in but they went to other clubs in thepast couple of weeks. That said, he did say none of them were absolute targets and didnt seem to bothered about that.

A dick because of something he did 10 years ago? Let's move on shall we...

Pearo is in training. Personally I would take him on as he could do well and we need some pace and direct play on the left. He didnt leave in the best way...but he was young, we make mistakes....let the crazy comments commence!

If anything then at least your honest!

Wouldn't change much with that. I would definately go with Twardzik as mistake aside he looked solid on Saturday. Carswell over Leitch for me. For me, either Thomas on left, if not, then Vigurs out left and Erwin or Law behind Sutton.

Doubt it as he said it after the game... I thought law was promising. He clearly needs match practice and to get up to speed but thought he showed good movement, willingness to get on the ball and decent control. He chose the wrong option a few times and his one shot was way off but I do think he will come good and be a good team addition.