Motherwell v Ross County - 06/02/24

[Stuwell2]

2 hours ago, Kmcalpin said:

I can't speak for anyone else but I never suggested that substitutions should be made at the 30 minute mark precisely. Changes could have been made at half time or slightly after, when we were 3 0 up and cruising. In any event it would depend on how it was communicated to those taken off ie "saving you for Friday."

I know, what I was trying to say was that I was catching up with posts that I hadn’t read and as I read through the posts I wrongly thought they were on the Aberdeen game thread but luckily I checked before posting  - posted it for a bit of a laugh and a cautionary tale to read carefully and check before posting - reread my original post

[SteelmaninOZ]

7 hours ago, Stuwell2 said:

Here’s a good reason I always try to check things before posting. 
Just been catching up on here, read a couple of post above and thought they were talking about Wednesday’s game - luckily I thought it a bit strange after I’d written my reply so checked what thread I was reading before posting this  
 

Kmcalpin, SinOZ and wellfan, are you all seriously saying that at 3-0 up after only 30 minutes any manager should be making subs?

Madness!

The subbed players would be raging and if the game had still ended 3-3 this forum quite rightly would have been in meltdown at Kettlewell’s decision to do so. 

Don’t think I said that after 30 minutes make subs SK should have changed it to another phase see how that went then look at subs. We are all entitled to an opinion on here thanks for your opinion. 🍻
COYW

[wellfan]

8 hours ago, Stuwell2 said:

Kmcalpin, SinOz and wellfan, are you all seriously saying that at 3-0 up after only 30 minutes any manager should be making subs?

No. Tactical changes to combat another manager making 2 subs to alter their formation doesn't always require subs to be made.