Mad Dog Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 5 minutes ago, mio said: Get in faddy!! I’ve been quite impressed by him tonight, he’s a bit of a Harry Paton upgrade with much better hair. And an end product too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy H Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 9 minutes ago, mio said: Get in faddy!! I’ve been quite impressed by him tonight, he’s a bit of a Harry Paton upgrade with much better hair. Harry Who 😛 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago Some encouraging signs from the new players, and can see some new tactical ideas taking shape - but work to be done. I thought Connelly handled the sweeper-keeper role better than Ward, albeit with little pressure being applied. The less said about the defence the better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, parko66 said: just over 5ft 8 He's just short of five foot ten and a half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benson Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago Some previous post mentioned ap first touch,how the fuck i haven't noticed before,truly awful,fsdinger impressed,bit of quality and great work ethic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago AP's not a hold-up man, he's an inside the box finisher. If we want to get the most from him, he needs to be facing the goal with the ball in front of him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Stall Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, wellgirl said: He's just short of five foot ten and a half. So 5ft 10 then? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one_luc_nijholt Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago Clearly we still have an issue centre of defence as their goal showed … but can see how he wants us to play and thought there were some decent spells of possession and moving the ball about well. The flicks and link up will come with time. Seeing a lot of doom and gloom on social media but definitely more cup half full tonight. Faddy looks a decent find! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Big Stall said: So 5ft 10 then? Well no. He's 1.79 m which is over five foot ten like I just said 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago Meanwhile, at the BBC, the latest results are in 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizzlyg Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, weeyin said: Meanwhile, at the BBC, the latest results are in Is the +70 injury time for Stama 🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parko66 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 12 minutes ago, wellgirl said: Well no. He's 1.79 m which is over five foot ten like I just said not if you put 1.79m into a converter online - comes out as......but i guess it depends on what converter is used - there seems to be a difference in them all lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, parko66 said: not if you put 1.79m into a converter online - comes out as...... Yeah. But some other converters say five foot ten if you put the same thing in - which is a bit odd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Bezzer! Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago You'll probably know that I'm not Slattery's biggest fan but he came back last season and was pretty good. These two games this season, garbage. Watt wasn't very good either and when you add that to our central defensive issues that's a big hole right down the middle of the pitch. Plus there is the centre forward position, again didn't see anything convincing from the guys that played there tonight. You aren't going to do anything at any level of football unless you sort out the spine of the team. There were occasional good spells of forward play, the two goal scorers did well. Maswanhise when he came on. But there was also fairly long spells when we looked disconnected, slack play, poor passing, poor delivery, poor set plays, laboured movement and tempo. It was all about winning tonight but unless performances improve we are going to come a cropper in one of these matches and if we play like this against Rangers it's going to be a very bad start to the season. Two games in, now we need to see better play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, wellgirl said: Yeah. But some other converters say five foot ten if you put the same thing in - which is a bit odd People my age grew up with both systems, so know there are 2.54cm to an inch. 179 / 2.54 = 70.47 inches. 12 inches to a foot, so 70.46 inches = 5 ft 10.47 inches. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ya Bezzer! said: You'll probably know that I'm not Slattery's biggest fan but he came back last season and was pretty good. These two games this season, garbage. Watt wasn't very good either and when you add that to our central defensive issues that's a big hole right down the middle of the pitch. Plus there is the centre forward position, again didn't see anything convincing from the guys that played there tonight. You aren't going to do anything at any level of football unless you sort out the spine of the team. There were occasional good spells of forward play, the two goal scorers did well. Maswanhise when he came on. But there was also fairly long spells when we looked disconnected, slack play, poor passing, poor delivery, poor set plays, laboured movement and tempo. It was all about winning tonight but unless performances improve we are going to come a cropper in one of these matches and if we play like this against Rangers it's going to be a very bad start to the season. Two games in, now we need to see better play. Slattery provided the cross for the goal though - so even if he didn't have a good game the contribution he made was valuable Agree but hopefully we'll get more players in between now and then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpy Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 4 minutes ago, parko66 said: not if you put 1.79m into a converter online - comes out as...... It is .87 of a foot, there are 12 inches in a foot so 12 x 0.872 = 5 feet and 10 and a half inches. one advantage of being old is you can think in metric and imperial. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago Just now, grumpy said: It is .87 of a foot, there are 12 inches in a foot so 12 x 0.872 = 5 feet and 10 and a half inches. one advantage of being old is you can think in metric and imperial. Exactly! 3ft 3 inches in a metre 2.2lbs in a kg 1.6 km in a mile They drilled us well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 2 minutes ago, weeyin said: People my age grew up with both systems, so know there are 2.54cm to an inch. 179 / 2.54 = 70.47 inches. 12 inches to a foot, so 70.46 inches = 5 ft 10.47 inches. I probably did too but I personally always think in feet and inches when it comes to height - imperial just kind of passed me by Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 2 minutes ago, weeyin said: Exactly! 3ft 3 inches in a metre 2.2lbs in a kg 1.6 km in a mile They drilled us well. I was never taught this at Coltness High - sacrilege Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy H Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 2 minutes ago, weeyin said: Exactly! 3ft 3 inches in a metre 2.2lbs in a kg 1.6 km in a mile They drilled us well. Next you will be quoting Chains and Furlongs.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy H Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 7 minutes ago, grumpy said: It is .87 of a foot, there are 12 inches in a foot so 12 x 0.872 = 5 feet and 10 and a half inches. one advantage of being old is you can think in metric and imperial. So he is 0.356 Poles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Andy H said: Next you will be quoting Chains and Furlongs.... never used those (but I never bet on the horses) We were also taught: 16oz in 1lb 14 lbs in a stone 8 stone in a hundredweight 20 hundredweight in a ton (and that's me done) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stv Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 29 minutes ago, wellgirl said: Well no. He's 1.79 m which is over five foot ten like I just said He’s wee for a keeper let’s just leave it at that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, stv said: He’s wee for a keeper let’s just leave it at that and most of the wee keepers add a few cm to their wiki page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.