faddythedaddy Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Spot on Jay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellarmy Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Jay yer spot on with wanting Lasley back in the team, we don't have alot of leaders but Lasley is definately one and weve missed him at a couple of points in the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albi Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 So charging towards their goal with double the attackers that there were defenders wasnt an obvious goal scoring opportunity? Aye ok, you're a dragon, what do you know. Did the fouled player have an obvious goalscoring opportunity? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motherwell Football Club Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 That question has nothing to do with the wording of the law. That phase of play was a goal scoring opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al B Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 RuddySaunders -- Reynolds -- Hutchison -- Hammell Humphrey -- Jennings -- Lasley -- O'Brien Sutton -- Jutkiewicz This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_411 Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 does no-one else think steven saunders at right back is another disaster waiting to happen? he gave the ball away too many times in that position last night; i think he's a great wee player but not at right back. I felt sorry for him when he got sent back out at RB last night after a difficult first half, Craigan should have been dropped to make way for him moving to centre back IMO. Admittedly Moutouakil didnt play great but he was out of position and could do a job at right back on saturday i reckon, especially up against Driver. ( i think he plays on the left aye?). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onthefringes Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Gannon got it completely wrong last night, but there are a few players who just haven't performed in the last two matches. Sorry to quote just the opening paragraph of your post Jay... aside, I'm sure Mr Gannon will realise he got it wrong. You mention Hateley as being out of form, the local press has Mr Gannon stating Hateley as outstanding last week and is questioning those on the fringes of the squad where I agree problems may have arisen through lack of competition for places, hence, the knicker wetters choice Lasley not being returned to the fold. Jay yer spot on with wanting Lasley back in the team, we don't have alot of leaders but Lasley is definately one and weve missed him at a couple of points in the season. When? We've been beaten once in the league and cup. It's nearly November Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finlay Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 The only games I have missed this season are Flamurtari and Steau away and I'll be damned when I'm in the ground and watching the game if I can confidently state the formation. Even with last night I have heard it referred to as 3-4-2-1/5-4-1 and so on. Players getting played out of position, formations being chopped and changed......I'm not sure our squad is good enough for that. If 4-4-3 didn't work for McGhee we toiled. Gannon isn't afraid to mix it but maybe a little too much. Most games we don't seem to have a midfield and very little threat up front. Despite shipping six goals in 180 minutes to St Mirren I am fairly happy with the defence. I'm fairly concerned where the goals are coming from as I am not convinced by Lukas. Maybe give 4-4-2 a go Jim!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
div Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 So charging towards their goal with double the attackers that there were defenders wasnt an obvious goal scoring opportunity? Aye ok, you're a dragon, what do you know. I think you appear to be talking about a different incident to me and one I'm not aware of happening. What I was talking about was Jim O'Brien nutmegging Jack Ross right on the touchline, maybe five yards inside the St.Mirren half, and Ross standing up straight in front of him and blocking him from running past him. If there was another incident then I certainly don't recall it ? As for their being "double the attackers that there were defenders" - that doesn't really matter either. There only has to be one other defending player capable of preventing the goal, other than the goalkeeper of course. Otherwise it isn't a clear or obvious opportunity. Anyway, enough of this pish, it doesn't matter in the big scheme of things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.