ScottW1886

Where in Livi are you from? There's a few Motherwell fans in Livi that I know of.......

He's no even posted!! C'mon guys, draw the teams - this is my lunch hour!!

I was just going by this!

2-1 I'd agree with as we'd have an away goal, and only require a 1-0 win at 'home'..... 3-1 confuses me!!

Probably not on here!! Think one of them is a poster on here and threatened legal action when he was named last week....

Back on....

Through the internet browser option - just click on any of the links to the game (on this site) and it'll show up.

Unfortunately it doesn't download the game.... Just seems to download a link so you could watch it in Realplayer......

Working great on my PS3 as well...... Agree with Neil about the zoom feature though!!

I don't actually disagree with you - you've picked up on a conditional comment I made about if someone wanted to blame Scott or The Sun for the lack of mention about the positive elements of the support in Wales, my money was on The Sun..... Peace!!

Sounds not too bad now that the previous programme has finished!!

I'm not a journalism student - Neil is!! I've no doubt that they would have reported the story the same way regardless of the team involved, but there is a strong feeling in most of this thread that the emphasis is on Motherwell in the headline as opposed to the two culprits.

McGhee said at the AGM that he had been talking to Maros' agent(s) about a deal for him to stay......

This is probably no use, and not sure if it would work or not but the game seems to be available to download from Realplayer. I clicked on a link earlier and was given the Realplayer download button. Not sure if it would download while playing, and you'd obviously need someone to do that and send you the saved game.....

As a journalism student, and hopefully a future journalist, would you have accepted a 'no comment' without trying to persuade him to give a comment? And the counter argument there is that Jimmy wouldn't have spoken without being approached by the press. I've never once blamed Scott, and if you read my post I actually laid the blame squarely at two other sets of feet..... But in the interests of debate, I think you have to blame either The Sun or Scott for the tone of the article - and my money's on The Sun having edited his article.

I think your inference there is a bit unfair on him. As you said, it was bound to end up being reported on whether he commented or not, and he's obviously been persuaded there were benefits in giving his side of it. Jimmy has given valid reasons as to why he didn't press charges, and just wanted to forget the whole episode. I suspect what was intended as an article highlighting the positive aspects of this sad episode has been twisted by the Sun into a sensationalist story, leaving Jimmy's stance seeming a bit strange. Bottom line is though that the story could not have been reported on if there was no assault and the fingers of blame for any perceived slight on the club or the fans should only be pointing one way.... at the 2 guys who carried out the assault.

It was the time that confused me!!

I think he'd be ideal as one of the 2 'holding' midfielders, but I don't think there's any chance of him returning....

Is it just me that can't see the game listed on their schedule for today?

What he said!! I'm hoping that this will be viewable through my PS3 and therefore the TV.....

The previous post was halted because it went down the road of naming and shaming the 2 guys....... For what it's worth, the press read these message boards, and there was a huge thread on the matter - I'm surprised it wasn't reported sooner. We have 2 posters who don't hide the fact that they are journalists, and neither they should by the way, but a story of this nature was bound to end up in the papers eventually. Would it have been worth the club getting their retaliation in first and issuing a story to the press agency expressing their disappointment at the incident and outlining their decision to ban the culprits? I don't know if that would have been positive or not right enough.....

Thanks for answering that - was genuinely wondering and not looking to create any issues....

There's also the question of replacement tops, or kit for new signings, if they are required. Last season I believe the players had 4 tops, short and long sleeved home and away tops, and if any replacements were required the club shop was plundered. If the stock in the shop is all that we are being supplied with then we could face problems on that front.

I'm sure the guy who wrote the article is a Motherwell fan and regular poster on here? Not seen the Wishy Press, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the same journalist.

Previous topic closed, but I think this is relevant; Sun Story