sbcmfc Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 Gav I think like some other folk you are failing to separate the incident itself and how the Compliance Officer goes about his business. It is the latter that most folk have a problem with. This! He also seems to disappear for weeks, even months, then is back with a vengeance for 2 or 3 weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madscot Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 Thats 4 times the compliance officer has pulled us up . i wonder what the stats are for the other 11 teams. 3-1 to the compliance officer BTW . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellfan1984 Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 Wasn't a foul during the game. Isn't a foul now (the IFAB are not going to meet for a few months now, and unless I missed it taking away "keeper protection" in the air is not on the agenda). The Only reason this is being discussed and he has been hit with a 2 game ban, as those that are expected to promote our game have no idea the rules and what is and isn't allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finlay Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 In fairness to him it was four going on ten that day. He did extremely well to limit them to four goals. Like it is a lot of the time we play the OF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatcalf Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 The SFA can go fuck themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 He also seems to disappear for weeks, even months, then is back with a vengeance for 2 or 3 weeks. Very true indeed. Even within the same game he'll pick on one incident and miss others equally as bad if not worse. A lot seems to depend on whether the commentators seem to want to highlight an incident or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haggischomper Posted December 5, 2012 Report Share Posted December 5, 2012 Higdon banned for a celebration we have seen a million times. Randolph banned for something we have seen a million times. Divers and cluggers allowed free reign. Bizarre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted December 5, 2012 Report Share Posted December 5, 2012 Higdon banned for a celebration we have seen a million times. Randolph banned for something we have seen a million times. Divers and cluggers allowed free reign. Bizarre. They know wee Motherwell will generally just bend over and take it. If it was celtic, rangers, hearts for example there's more chance they'd kick up a fuss over it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.