Busta Nut Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 I'm sure I remember someone posting a summary of the rules after the ICT game a couple of seasons ago. From what I can remember the upshot was basically "it favours the attacking team". So given that Rangers scored from it, it would be unlikely to be retaken unless someone seriously intruded and got in the keeper's way. I am sure it's in the attacking teams favour if the encroacher is a defender. ball goes in but defender was 5 yards in the box, goal. Keeper saves defender is 5 yards in, re-take. Pretty sure Kenny Miller is not allowed to encroach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat_tony Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 I am sure it's in the attacking teams favour if the encroacher is a defender. ball goes in but defender was 5 yards in the box, goal. Keeper saves defender is 5 yards in, re-take. Pretty sure Kenny Miller is not allowed to encroach. You may very well be right, my memory's a bit fuzzy. It's probably more likely to be "favour the guy in the Rangers shirt" 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistAndShout Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 If the attackers are in the box and it's scored, it should be a retake. If it's missed then play should continue. If the defenders encroach and it's missed it should be retaken. If it's scored the goal stands. Very, very rarely applied to be honest. The ICT one should have been retaken a second time actually. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Maybe they should just simplify it, so that once the penalty taker kicks it, it's a goal if he scores and goal kick to the defending team if he misses (including saves from the keeper). That way, encroaching is pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ropy Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Nae rebounds, I'm sure we played that as kids Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuwell Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Just watched the game and can't believe the ref never gave us a penalty for the push on Biwman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoF Posted August 10, 2017 Report Share Posted August 10, 2017 What was the attendance? 12k +? Must be the highest for years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dezz Posted August 10, 2017 Report Share Posted August 10, 2017 What was the attendance? 12k +? Must be the highest for years. I think it was a few shy of 10k. Not quite 12k, but must be one of the highest attendances at Fir Park for a good while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numpty Posted August 10, 2017 Report Share Posted August 10, 2017 I think it was a few shy of 10k. Not quite 12k, but must be one of the highest attendances at Fir Park for a good while. Yep, 9974 was the official figure. Always expect a few more for first home game of the season (even though it technically wasn't), but given we probably lost a few to time/day/live telly, a very healthy turnout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoF Posted August 10, 2017 Report Share Posted August 10, 2017 Yep, 9974 was the official figure. Always expect a few more for first home game of the season (even though it technically wasn't), but given we probably lost a few to time/day/live telly, a very healthy turnout. Cheers. Missed the game and was told it was over 12k. We'll have lost a few due the opposition as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted August 10, 2017 Report Share Posted August 10, 2017 Cheers. Missed the game and was told it was over 12k. We'll have lost a few due the opposition as well. I'm sure they're was a club employee statement on the Friday expecting around 11k , so good chunk of the difference could well be absent season ticket holders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.