Im not sure I agree with or fully understand what they are saying.
Surely the club requires to be run on a sustainable basis regardless of who owns it? In other words we only spend the cash we generate.
The Well Society was supposed to be operated as an overdraft facility to aid cash flow during points in the season when revenues were low and there was still expenditure requiring to be covered.
That being the case the money going in and out of the Society should actually accumulate over time and become larger as more donations are made.
If we are still running that model, then the only thing a wealthy shareholder would bring is a bigger overdraft facility.
If we are not running that model then I would be concerned as to what we are opening ourselves up to.
What wealthy benefactor is going to put investment into the club without wanting a return on that investment?
If they want a return, where is it going to come from? We went down that route before and it nearly finished us.
So, whilst it would appear to be a good thing that changes are afoot and we are to get new blood and new ideas into the club, I think we should be careful what we wish for.
The guys who have been running the club may not have done everything to the satisfaction of the fans and they will certainly have made mistakes. But they were all Motherwell fans and had the best interests of the club at heart.
I thank them for their service and hope they have left behind a plan to secure our future going forward.