steelman1991

Where did you see this about the club organising coaches?

Christ - we get to a semi-final once every decade (or at least that's how it feels) and all some can do is moan about the ticket prices - sheeesh. Clearly it's dictated by the other three clubs who's fans are used to paying extortionate prices - the prices are what they are - pony up, or watch on telly, your choice. I know where I'll be - Hampden here we come.

You are biased, but with every right to be - he was also good in goals as well. My hero throughout his playing career and beyond.

I might be wrong, but surely that would have to have been in place, to enable him to play in U-20 matches?

"He's one of our own" - Allan Campbell

Woooooosh

Ah right - i thought it was just an opportune moment to make the substitution - perhaps not, but I haven't seen anything reported.

Why that?

Didn't he just livivoice. Celtic certainly got the best out of him. RIP Paul.

Ffs you need to watch the highlights again. You've just imagined that. Kipre was well beaten by their no 20 no bobbling ball, either at the game or on YouTube. Of course there are dozens of crosses, but only the one you used to justify your opinion. EDIT - OK re-read your post, presume your referring to the comment about the second goal - might have made it clearer by quoting which post you were responding to.

Seriously....one of the incidents you blame Dunne for actually came from Kipre getting skinned and allowing the cross into the box to start with, don't see you criticising that - guess you must like Kipre a lot to escape your wrath.

Yet ... you decide to overlook (conveniently again) the fact that Dunne is working under similar conditions on the left-hand side, with our first choice right back. Dunne, like the rest of the team, gave a pleasing and comfortable performance after weathering the expected early onslaught from the hosts. Little between the flanks IMO, yet we get the constant criticism of one individual - I suppose it's the 'Motherwell way'. We look far more physical and mobile with him there than with Hammell, again IMO. Happy to trust Robinson's opinions and selection decisions - that includes the selection of Andy Rose, another singled out for unfair criticism, again IMO, by the usual suspects.

................ yet you ignore the fact that Kipre got ripped a new one for the first 30 minutes on the opposite flank

He went down with an almighty thud - right behind me - one of those get up "I'm not hurt, hope nobody saw me" moments. Hope he's OK but he will be sore this morning of that I've no doubt ouch!!!

First and foremost I thought that was an excellent game - thoroughly enjoyed it. Hibs as expected as the home pressed us from the first whistle, but we proved dangerous on the counter. Even at 2-0 we never looked out of it. To me the ref was far too influenced by the big home crowd and Hibs players falling over at every opportunity, very poor performance. Going into the final quarter there was only going to be one winner and we probably should have edged it. The team in general deserve praise, but thought Bowman, Rose, Moult (for his 2 goals) and Tait were excellent today.

Nah - 'that lithuanian boy' is just fine for now

Nah - more like a mobile Colin "Psycho" O'Neill - without the "Psycho" bit

LOL nothing like hedging your bets - so either it's going to be a draw, a Motherwell or Kilmarnock win.

Yes in Scotland - 11.00 pm in England

The years prior to that certainly weren't enjoyable. I'm with Big Stall on this one - revisionist claptrap, it was the worst years of my 50+ years following the 'Well.

Well done the 'wee well.

Thanks mate - that's a good deal. Have I missed an announcement somewhere on this 'initiative' - are other clubs involved as well?

Any idea what the "reciprocal reduced SPFL Prem deal" is?

I know mate - was more a rhetorical question. No cynisim, just reality lol.

For pity's sake is this all we've got to get upset about - will we see the same indignation and offence when the 'other mob' come to town - thinking their 'songbook' is far more offensive than the 'Sash'. Let's hear it for the 'Boy's of the Old Brigade' et al. Anyway let's get back to the topic of the thread - anybody think that the penalty would have been awarded had the 'offence' taken place in their box?