weeyin

Lego is much more expensive than I remember.

Lambert was a half decent player. Surprised his career took such a big dip after he left us with just the one Champions League Winner's medal to his name

He has scored less goals total since 2011 than Moult has scored in his Motherwell career. I'm not saying he was useless, but we made more money than he was worth when we sold him.

I'm always curious how much teams like Forest Green Rovers pay their players these days. They used to be my local club (when they changed their name to Stroud FC and then back to Forest Green Rovers). Back then, ticket prices were very cheap, but I see now they charge 16 quid to stand and 18 or 20 quid to sit - so you have to think the wages are decent.

We got the best side of that deal when we sold him on.

As far as great names go Shaquille Coulthirst is fine, but he's no Crawford Baptie.

I don't know about the disruptive influence thing, but one or two people at Fir Park (including Crags) have publicly mentioned that while he has the talent, his attitude needs some work.

The first problem is that the boardrooms up and down the country, and at all levels of the game, are full of Old Firm fans. The second problem is that, even where they aren't Old Firm fans, they believe we need to keep the OF happy for the financial health of their club. I doubt it will ever change,

The biggest thing Erwin is missing from his game since he left us is Skippy telling him what to do for 90 mins.

Not Davie Irons, then?

Then better not take the risk, and just not punch anyone.

I'd rather we had a game, but enjoying the FA Cup games today. Rochdale first and now PNE running rings round Arsenal.

If we had just punted Humphrey, we'd be seeing all the "found his level" posts.

The new model, as mentioned during the Well Society Q&A means that we don't have to sell any more players this season. We have, in effect, a line of credit with Les and JB, with a repayment schedule that is very favourable. We also have a guaranteed bump in income next season if we stay in the top league. So staying in the top league has to be a priority. There's no point in paying off loans unnecessarily early if it means we get relegated. I think the balance we have right now is working pretty well. Brought in some money for Johnson, Pearson and Hall while blooding a number of youngsters. We have also done some good business by extending the contracts of Cadden and some of the youth prospects. If we repeat that over the next 2 or 3 years we should be in sound financial shape. Of course, if we get an big offer for a player we need to consider it, but we are already showing that we are in a stronger position to negotiate and we should continue down that path. We had figure in mind for Marvin and rather than rolling over (like prior years) we held out until we got that number. If Moult wants to (quite reasonably) move on, we should be able to get the same, or more, in June than we will in January.

If he did end up in the EPL I'd be he'll score more league goals there than Mr. Jutkiewicz.

Is 25 too young to join Grimsby? I'll never understand these UEFA Cross Border transfer rules.

As was pointed out at the society Q&A we have absolutely no need to sell any players this window. So if any team wants to buy they are going to have to make an offer we can't refuse. If Moult continues his form and wants to move on, I doubt we'd have any problems selling him. 500k? They can have Craig Moore for that.

Adding this here, rather than starting a new thread, but mods feel free to move elsewhere. An excellent article in the Evening Times by Mr. Mullen, with 'Flow again giving a well constructed argument against the "Elite 8" youth programme. http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/spfl/15002576.Exclusive__Motherwell_CEO_Alan_Burrows_on_the_provincial_pitfalls_of_Project_Brave/

I'm usually the world's biggest pessimist when it comes to these games (probably because we went years without winning one), but I think we are going to grind out a win this time. Moult and Skippy taking the lead and Lionel doing a turn.

Louis is going to take care of them in the double header - assisted by Skippy.

You are just reiterating my point about needing to be consistent.

I'm not a fan of the rule, but for every rule in the book the ref needs to have discretion. Of course, that doesn't excuse the obvious inconsistencies in their application, but decisions have to made in context of specific situations.

Under the old rules, "ungentlemanly behaviour" was a catchall that a ref could use for booking a player who was persistently being a pest. That was replaced in the 90s with "unsporting behaviour", but I think could still be used in the same way. Too lazy to check, but I think "unsporting behaviour" is still an option for refs.

I'd happily ban them, but that shipped has sailed, I think, since the authorities gave them all the green light. Accies is the worst of the lot - it even looks mince, which is quite an achievement.

The cash has been going straight into the directors' back pockets since the Jan Stepek days. That isn't exactly a secret. And it was no surprise when the Morrisons' cash went the same way. It may be different now, but in recent years the pitch was in use most nights. And not by the first team. They also have a cordial relationship with the local council, but also not much of a secret. Hamilton's not a big town and I think everyone is aware of the wheeling and dealing that has gone on with Accies. I know I haven't lived there for a while, but I still know people directly involved with the club. In the late 70s and 80s there were fairly credible stories they "couldn't afford" to be promoted. The only thing that would surprise me (and their fans) was if money was re-invested in the club. Regardless, they have still been our most consistent local rival in the past 20 (going on 30) years and I'd rather be playing them at New Year than St Mirren.