Jump to content

Ernie

Legends
  • Posts

    586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ernie

  1. For christ sake he wasnae as good as some of you think and he was better than some of you think but and this is the important thing he left us for more money in England........... end of :lol:

  2. Almost bang on the money for me, although would have the Kaiser ahead of Quinn and Porter ahead of McCormack. I'm trying desperately hard to think of a midfielder to get rid of that dick Pearson as well :lol:

     

    I can understand your thinking but for me Quinn was a better attacking full back although Corrigan offers more options in defence. Porter would be a better foil for Skippy who would profit from the big man's knockdowns. Love him or hate him I think Pearo was the best left sided midfielder we have had in the last 10 years and as someone else said the interplay between him Hammell and McFadden was a treat to watch especially the day we thrashed Livi

  3. Ross Forbes is the closest we're ever going to get to a Xavi type of player*. How often do you see Xavi sprinting? How often do you see him pouputting in a crunching tackle? What Forbes brings is a player if given the ball can create something from nothing. The question week in, week out is going to be can the players around him see those passes.

     

    I know some people on here want our midfielders to be cloggers, who put in the strong "kick up in the air tackles" but I'm quite glad we have a midfielder like Forbes. Someone with a little bit of technical skill - and if we can keep him signing contracts (or at least one more, we will make money out of him).

     

    Oh and no point comparing him to Hateley, as I doubt Hateley would be as effective in a more forward role.

     

     

     

     

    *In no way am I saying Forbes is as good as Xavi etc.

     

    Does that mean that if Forbes is not playing then we don't have anybody who can create an opportunity? Technical skill and ability are allright when you are playing in a European type game where the midfield maestro can get time on the ball but we don't play many of them each year (probably because most of out midfield are cloggers) ;) Hately by the way was signed as a defensive midfielder which is basically where Lasley plays when Forbes is in the team.

  4. I would say we do have backup in the form of Hateley and Fitzpatrick.

     

    I would rather see Hately play midfield than Forbes, got a better engine, can tackle, can pass the ball every bit as well and is a good dead ball player. I don't think Fitzy does the same job as Jennings or Lasley but he could do as useful a job as Forbes.

  5. Aye, all these superb passers of a ball need to be eliminated from the game ASAP. They're ruining it for the cloggers.

     

    Not what I mean't at all. Forbes has bags of talent, wonderful passer of the ball and he takes a good dead ball, however, if Lasley or Jennings are injured we don't have the back up to allow Forbes to play, therefore for a club like ours he is a luxury. However, if he learns how to tackle, that his right foot is not just for standing on and not need a 10 yard start for a 5 yard sprint then he will do wonderfully well at Motherwell.

  6. Reynolds for me. Like Yir Elder I thought he strolled through the game. Forbes I think is too inconsistent and to one footed to be a top player. His passing at times was superb last night but he cannae tackle a fish supper. He is a luxury player but I don't think he is a luxury that we can afford to have.

  7. I think it's fantastic the General Manager of the club we support has taken time to respond to a thread on a fans message board. How many other clubs would have people do that? She took the time to post a more than decent informative post, for which she was under no obligation whatsoever to do and for that Leaanne and the club should be commended.

     

    Especially since much of the thread is absolute shite and nonsense!

     

    Totally agree Milo with this board I would say the future is bright. Oh and that is not a suggestion of a sponsor.

  8. I said it months ago and I will say it again. Get football off the TV and back to 3.00pm on a saturday or 7.30 on a wednesday. Highlight package on a saturday night and the same on a sunday tea time. Oh and when we are doing that lets bring back the bold erchie and his shredded wheat hair.

    No................... chance.

     

    Telly rules the game now so get used to it, the chairmen opened pandora's box and sold out a long time ago and the box will never be shut again. Unfortunately arm chair fans will be more the norm.

  9. 2. murphy totally fucks up marking john rankin then hibs get a couple of wee breaks of the ball. can't really blame ruddy as it goes through reynolds' legs

     

    First off apologies if this has been said already but I was on holiday last week and missed the game, what a bummer that was. However, having watched the highlights today on the BBC I must say if it was Fraser who lost that goal he would have been hung drawn and quartered and blamed for the other 5. Just like Celtic and Dundee Utd games the whole defence was shocking at times.

  10. There are a few candidates for POTY, Sutton, Ruddy, Lucas and Hately to name a few but I voted for Crags. Although he didn't have a wonderful season and was responsible for a few mistakes here and there, his attitude, professionalism and desire to play for the club throughout the turmoil of gannon was an example to all. The leadership that he showed when Broon/Knox came in was wonderful and can only have been a good example for the younger players. Not a sparkling performance on the pitch but a wonderful performance as a leader and an ambassador for the club.

  11. I wasn't happy when I heard that Brown and Knox were our management team. However, the manner in which the team has played since their arrival and his statement today that " I am a Motherwell man" makes me wonder why I doubted him. I look forward to the start of next season with baited breath. Away the 'Well

  12. So will we need another new pitch this summer and what if we get the same weather come december? the pitch has been a mess for four months yet there seems to be very little info about what is going to happen next.

     

    If we get the same weather this winter then the park is screwed. However, I don't know if we will need a complete new pitch as some areas look like they have survived betterthan others. The heavy wear areas goalmouths, etc have been turfed which should give it a better chance of gaining a grip. Unless we spend 6 weeks digging the pitch up again I think that the grass should get a better chance to knit together but that will still be dependant on weather, need a warmish, wettish period from mid May to mid July to give the grass a chance. However it is all dependant on weather

  13. Totally agree, but why is it we are the only club going through this every year? all the other clubs who had the same winter as us are back playing on grass while we are still trying to introduce beach football to the paying public

     

    Ours is a new pitch which never got the chance to lay down a very strong root structure. If we had had a mild winter without too much frost the roots would have strengthened and we would have seen the benefit next term. Falkirk, St Mirren and Aberdeen's pitches were all atrocious but being a couple of years older they survived the harsh weather better and could recover quicker. By the way grass is one of the hardest plants to kill with an ability to survive drought and flodd with equal ease, however boiling the roots is one good way of killing it. To be fair to the club they have tried their best and have re-laid parts of the pitch unfortunately for Michael Fraser he stood on one of the new turfs and ended up on his arse.

  14. The difference was there to see on tuesday night when we passed celtic off the park for long spells, then come back to fir park yesterday with balls bobbling and bouncing all over the place. blaming individuals (murphy v falkirk and now fraser)glosses over the fact that our own club created our biggest problem with that disgrace of a pitch

     

    I think the worst winter in 30 years contributed a bit as well and the stupid rule that you can't have a match postponed for weather, so you boil the roots of your pitch.

  15. Interesting thread.

     

    I wouldn't be against a move to a new stadium, but I would think that the site Motherwell have couldn't be bettered. Unless rail links were close to the new ground.

     

    Why is it only in the last 2-3 seasons that the lack of sunlight on the South Stand side of the pitch has been an issue?

     

    Never used to have any problems with the pitch.

     

    I think it is more to do with the higher water table than the lack of sunlight. I am sure that I read that as a reason for the digging out of the pitch last summer but I could be wrong.

  16. didnt say they went bust cause they were cheap, just saying i was sure they have gone bust since building the stadium. According to the blackpol fans tho it was a job done on the cheap tho which was what i was getting at

     

    If the materials used were those specified and those recommended then they would be within budget. Every firm/ constructor/ client tries the best to get the materials at the most competitive price but this does not mean they are cheap. Before anyone mentions poor workmanship it is harder to get away with this due to the increase in quality control measures across the whole industry. Construction is unfortunately like education everybody knows what it is all about and they can all have an informed opinion :doh:

×
×
  • Create New...