texanwellfan

I hope we improve a bit, soon. This is a hard watch so far.

I like Halliday. Didn’t play that well last week but I think most of our players are going to be like that some good weeks and some bad weeks. Just not so good when we encounter this weeks where they all have a bad game on the same day !!

At this point I’d be very happy to see us beat them and just award 3 points to rangers. Oh and award us 3 points against hibs 😜

They should also be under the gun to get it fixed for next season.

We could have got him for a tenner a week then??

Covid? edit: sorry, didn’t see other posts from fellow smart asses before I replied.

In other words, “We are not going to postpone the game till you are all half way here”.

But we are talking about the club so shouldn’t we be going with the majority of the shareholders??

One thing that I don’t fully understand is that the well society is the major share holder but votes as a unit (from what I’ve read but could be wrong). So does it get viewed as ‘one vote’ on the board or does it get viewed as the vote of X amount of share holders? If it gets treated as the vote of X amount of share holders by the board (voting as a unit) then I don’t think that is right. If the WS vote is split 60/40 or 30/70 or whatever it should be presented that way at the board to reflect the will of the share holders rather than taking the vote of a group of shareholders and basically flipping their vote, whichever way. I can see simple majority votes when the WS wants to decide on an action that is a decision to be made by the WS, like should we give money to the club to help cover cost of pitch upgrade but when it’s a vote to be made regarding an action to be taken by the club the each share holder should have their vote counted as they cast it and not nullified by being in a group such as the WS. Another point is that not all members contribute the same so does higher contributions mean more votes or shared? That applies to voting to decide as a unit and also if they were to present any vote as a ratio of for and against.

Good advice!!

I think SK will improve with time. There’s a lot of “experienced” managers out there who will not improve much and wouldn’t do any better job than what the inexperienced SK has done.

If we can beat Dundee, and hibs don’t win, plus Aberdeen beat Livingston that would set up a cracker of a pre split weekend with Aberdeen v Dundee and Motherwell v Hibs. All four teams playing for sixth spot. (Also assuming Dundee lose to Rangers in their midweek game) Edit: though Aberdeen would have to win by a cricket score to get 6th

I Like Halliday but he had a bad game today. Normally a composed player but today was just a slow player. Hopefully he has more good games than bad games.

Not quite yet but as good as.

That’s as bad a game as I’ve seen in a while. Both teams absolutely terrible.

Finally.

We have no shape or pattern, aimlessly wandering around and not knowing how to pass a ball.

Looks like nobody can be arsed today on here. Nothing on field to rule us up.

Need to offer a bit more going forward

Forgot we were still an hour out !

No team news yet?

3-1 for super well as we resume converting chances again after missing a bundle against Aberdeen. Bair, Vale and Bevis on the score sheet.

Doesn’t seem as bad as first reported then.

Hard to believe he’s only 19.

Would be nicer if we could have made some money from Spittal but perhaps he would not be moving on if a transfer fee was required.