Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/15/2023 in all areas

  1. 6 points
  2. As others have said, there's a balance to be struck. We should trust the Society and club Directors to take care of the day to day running of the club, and commercially sensitive issues, and not get involved. Strategic decisions are a different matter entirely. Since Alan Burrows' departure, communications have been poor. From what I hear there also have been more general issues since before he left. Currently the club is rudderless off the field. This isn't good enough for a fan owned club. Yes, some of that is down to the Society and probably the Club itself. Thats not in doubt. It ought to be more accountable to the rank and file members. However, there is another side to the issue. Members themselves need to do more to become involved. That might only mean submitting comments prior to Society Board meetings; it might mean attending AGMs either in person or remotely; it might also mean, heaven forbid, volunteering! Elected Board members or paid officials can't do it all on their own, nor should they. Its not good enough for us all to say "Its nought to do with me - try somebody else". The recent Society elections were an opportunity to change things. I would like to know what percentage of members voted in the recent elcetions. That will be interesting. There are some new Board members voted in and they have my support. I hope they can encourage change. There are also some hard working and able existing Board members lets not forget. Its all very well for us to come on here and have a good grouse but we have to get more involved, even if only in a minor way.
    4 points
  3. The latest WS email has a link to send in questions for the upcoming board meeting, so dust off your typing fingers.
    2 points
  4. I'm pretty sure that a feasibility study is planned and the basic details were disclosed at the most recent Well Society AGM. I attended it virtually, but others may be able to confirm/correct this point. It was also mentioned at the AGM that approval for such things would be sought via consultation with members. Nonetheless, if you're a member of the WS, attending events in person or online is the best way to access information and make your feelings heard. If not, I'm not sure of the answer as Club and WS comms are varied.
    2 points
  5. I won't be there tomorrow but will do my rallying cry and hope our support get behind the manager and lads tomorrow. With a vocal support it can be a 12th man and please.....pleassseeeeee let's not boo players when they come on or at any time....how on earth that helps a player confidence I will never know ...... COYW
    1 point
  6. When you see some of those poor kids it puts football into perspective. Well done to SK and the players
    1 point
  7. Yes, we need to get more crosses from Spencer. Gent seemed to have more room/success than Spencer did last week. The more crosses we get in the more chance of scoring. Also, having St Mirren have to deal with wide threats should leave more room in middle.
    1 point
  8. We don't need in depth commercially sensitive information its not rocket science ffs, a simple "the club is looking at possible new training facilities " or "the club are carrying out a feasibility study on a possible relocation to a new stadium" General info that gives the fanbase an insight Into the general direction the club is going, that's all that's needed here, especially for WS members contributing financially. The WS are the majority shareholders ffs nothing should be signed off without their approval, I know that means asking the membership their views etc but if its not done then its just ad another poster said " keep giving us your cash every month, technically you'll be in charge but In reality we'll make the decisions and you have no say.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00
×
×
  • Create New...