Been wondering that myself. I don't think I'd actually be that gutted if we were papped out tonight, assuming it's not a result of another St Mirren-esque performance or a ludicrous refereeing error. But some folk seem to be thinking if we don't win something with this team we never will, and hopefully things won't turn too negative on here if that happens as there will still be plenty to play for (and hopefully, wins and performances to enjoy).
They usually have the top home attendance in Australia, averaging around 15,000. Their new stadium, which they share with a couple of rugby teams, holds about 42,000 - not sure where they’re playing in that video, but it’s not that one. (Auckland who play in the same league have had slightly higher attendances in recent years, but they’re in NZ of course.)
Also, it always feels (to me at least) like we're not playing as well when it's pissing it down and the pitch doesn't look great, even though we probably are.
Simply people mis-hearing "should've" as "should of". It's not a new thing, according to the OED the oldest recorded usage is 1814, and Charlotte Brontë used it in a letter in 1853.
Hopefully he's just got a burst nose from JBA giving him a proper headbutt after the St Mirren game, to teach him how to go down more convincingly next time.