Jump to content

Big Wispy Flossy

Legends
  • Posts

    1,732
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by Big Wispy Flossy

  1. He should be going nowhere unless a fee is involved.
  2. I thought cadden was poor apart from one time in second back when he worked back and retrieved ball on the edge of our own box.
  3. That is true. Hopefully that's been the case otherwise he's got himself in to a horrible state of fitness over the summer. Others like McManus and Lasley have managed to be professional and keep themselves in decent shape
  4. Are clubs genuinely interested in buying either of them?
  5. I agree. We played ok in spells I would be more concerned if we never created any chances. That said I would expect every team in the top league to create chances against them this season their defence is chronic. The new guys showed up well as did McManus and, dare I say it chalmers. McDonald and hammell looked grossly overweight
  6. Theres no logic in telling a dead person anything
  7. David Turnbull is more suited to playing the advanced role than Allan Campbell. Cadden is currently a better option than both and he has his limitations - his passing is not upto the standard required to play there at this moment in time.
  8. Ripley - a very capable goal keeper. His main strengths are shop stopping and one on ones. Not any obvious weaknesses but is prone to the odd lack of concentration. Our best since John ruddy and Darren Randolph (both international goalies) As others have suggested engages with the club and supporters, not typical of other loanees who only seem interested in collecting a wage and then returning to parent club. Law - He's not a midfielder which is where we played him for the first 6 months of the season two seasons ago and which nearly led to relegation. Latterly played at full back for us. Positives gets forward well and can play a good cross in to the box. Now for the disadvantages - He struggles positionally at times and switches off at the back post. I cannot see him being good enough to be a first pick at league one level. Erwin - very good technically and links play well. Best played through the middle either as front man or just off, not as a winger. For his size he's not good in the air. Can score a goal out of nothing but equally likely to miss a sitter. Robinson - very well thought of. It will be interesting to see how his first gig as manager turns out as good number twos don't always result in good managers. Good luck
  9. Robinson confirmed at Oldham
  10. Not sure if we will be paying former players anything. However I agree with a lot of posters why are we continuing to celebrate something that occurred 25 years ago? We could have been proud if rangers Celtic Aberdeen and hearts had a monopoly on the domestic cups over that period but not so - off the top my head Inverness Ross county Dundee Utd Kilmarnock st mirren and HIbs FFS have all tasted success over that period. Also ruins a nice looking strip.
  11. He played centre mid for England u19s but I've seen nothing of him in a Motherwell shirt to suggest he can play there
  12. You are absolutely correct. I might go even further to suggest we passed disaster half a mile ago on the left hand side
  13. He was eligible to play with the u17s last season
  14. That's absolute nonsense. Cadden has to improve his passing significantly and know how to get in to good goal scoring positions (and score them) before he can be considered in the same breath as Pearson
  15. The principle of the club statement (unfair fixtures) was probably the correct call. That said whoever decided to include, for all intents and purposes, sucking the blue cock for money, should be brought to task
  16. Not sure but erwin signed for us when he was 9, hall when he was16. Surely that would be factor.
×
×
  • Create New...