Jump to content

Spiderpig

Legends
  • Posts

    5,543
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    103

Everything posted by Spiderpig

  1. If the figure quoted of £300 for the basic level of membership is accurate then only 1,000 people taking up the offer is 300 K raised add to that the Business and corporate investors and the 500 K or even more figure is achievable. Even for a small club like ours i dont think its an unrealistic target.
  2. +1 The millionaire benefactor approach does not fill me with confidence, they get bored, lose their cash, die etc and the club is left in a precarious situation, what happened to Gretna and nearly to us should serve as a warning. Football needs to be run and financed in a sustainable manner, ie clubs living within their means, so hopefully this scheme will ensure that motherwell are financially sound for the future.
  3. There has to be a few sensible posts in between all the shamless condemnation of the Chief exec by the Lip, just trying to restore some balance to the force.
  4. Maybe season tickets will be valid for the game ?
  5. The proposed scheme is not Leeann dempsters idea its a board decision, and i dont think that they will be rushing into any half baked ideas with the finances of the club. The one member 1 vote at whatever level of financial commitment you choose is a great idea, it will generate income but i dont think that the board are naive enought to think that it will solve all their financial worries. There will still be major inputs from sponsors, corporate clients, merchandising, TV money, advertising, gate receipts and ticket sales this is where the bulk of the funding will come from. The community ownership will give the ordinary fans a voice in return for a financial commitment which will be a bonus to the club in addition to their existing income streams, so how can that be a bad thing. If it works we may have a greater say in how the club is run, not in the normal day to day stuff or major decisions but in the decisions that directly affect the fans, ie ticket costs, club catering, stewarding, etc
  6. +1 he should never have been given a contract in the first place, how much money did the club waste on this Fud, that could have been better spent elsewhere.
  7. Whit Why would you want someone that bad anywhere near a football team, you could go to any ground and get thousands of guy's with a physical presence about them but who cant play football, Kenneth is in that category.
  8. All these players re-signing and deals done in June to bring in replacements is not our usual style, we normally have to wait until 5 mins before the transfer window closes and pick up the dross that's left.
  9. Because the specky fud in charge of Scotland used to manage Kenneth and thinks he is a good player, the same argument applies to Conway, and Goodwillie. I think the main criteria for a Scotland cap now is to have been involved at Tannadice.
  10. Fowler and Gloria what a strike force that would have been
  11. One member one vote and a move to a new stadium at some point it is then, should be interesting to see how it works out, ordinary supporters with a genuine say in how the club is run can only be a good thing, well done to Leeann and the rest of the board. 1 point though will the £300 for your share include your season ticket or maybe a free pie and bovril every game
  12. 2K a week is over £100,000 a year a very good offer if you have no job and looking for work as Porter is, so never say never.
  13. Bringing Hughes back would be a good bit of business if we can afford him. But as he has no deal at the moment he may feel a move back up the road is good for him and his family, so wages may not be a big issue. He was a top player last time with us and would be a good addition to the midfield, i.e someone who can hold the ball up and pick a pass out wide for Murphy or Humphrey, or over the top to Higdon.
  14. Why do we need a new kit every year whats wrong with the old one ? change the sponsor but keep the same design, or do what they done this year sell the tops without the sponsor . They would sell a lot more, why should the fans be ripped off to become unpaid advertisers for Cash converters !
  15. +1 have to agree with that big strong target man who scores a few goals, would be a good replacement for Sutton
  16. straight red for that effort
  17. Aye right, he is worth a punt in the Baws, he is pish
  18. Great player but out of our league as far as wages go i think
  19. Does anyone else think that the "fantastic early bird discount" as described on the official web site of a massive £10 for renewing your ST before the end of May is not exactly a deal clincher.
  20. As bad as it sounds i have to agree, 20 years waiting for another Scottish cup final day out and it turned out a total anti climax. The main problem with the lack of atmosphere from the well fans was that probably 90% of them didn't really care who won, they were day trippers out for a cup final. I went to the toilet at about 60 mins and there were hundreds of people leaving FFS, 30 mins to go in a cup final that says it all really.
  21. That sounds a good shout, if it was correctly priced it could be added to the Season book package if you are buying one, or as a separate deal if not. The basic principle is good, one share = 1 vote etc, but nobody is that naive to think that we will influence any real decisions, as the bulk of the shareholding will still be in the hands of a few. But as recent events have shown companies / directors etc cannot afford to ignore the shareholders, so on contencious issues the ordinary fans could have an important say.
  22. +1 ffs you would need to be on drink/ drugs or both to think that would .be a good signing
×
×
  • Create New...