texanwellfan

Ok I’m confused (seems normal mode for me on this) surely WS vote has to occur first in order to cast the WS vote as the 71% shareholder at the exec. Board vote? Perhaps I am not understanding how many voting instances there needs to be and what each one is about?

Yes

But the idea is for Barmack to bring in more money/investment for the club so that there will be enough coming in to make a difference. However, that’s pretty much a pig in a poke so far. Seems to be very Trumpish, has an idea but no plan or details.

I quite like that top one

I’m pleading the 5th !

And in parts of Texas

Oh you were working that day? 😂😂😂

I must have missed Robinson. Who is he and where did we get him?

Search for twee Keer rots bij on you tube for highlights I didn’t know how to get the link and copy paste it using my phone

I go back and forth although I think I still say Holland most of the time.

Who/where did we play?

July??

Normal service has been resumed

I’m fine with it

I’m sure Grizzly will approve of your reply

I don’t even know who he is.

Sounds like WS rules may need updated to ensure the members have their say on major decisions so that the board have to vote per the majority wishes of the WS members, and not on what they think is best?

Don’t know but a good performance can only help his value

Hope the big man gets on and bags a few goals. cha Ching!

Definitely money wise you are correct but my understanding is that he would bring further financial benefits into the club using his skills and contacts. However, that is a very nebulous statement with no plan proposed or metrics to measure success. Reminds of Trump. I’ll do this or do that but there’s never any plan to actually get it done which of course results in nothing getting done. So I think we are basically taking a gamble (with WS betting the shirt off their back) on EB being able to perform with very little consequences for him if we Lose the bet.

Feely. Sounds like one of the dwarfs who got cut for being naughty. Along with Humpy and Gropey.

Agree with bold print, good point to clarify.

Well let’s hope the WS lay it out nice and simple for the members to review and vote on. Already been summarized in a good manner on several posts and when presented like that it’s really hard to come to the conclusion that it’s a good deal. Especially when you consider there doesn’t appear to be a concise clear plan, with measurable metrics, put forth by EB as to how the club is going to benefit or how he is going to benefit. Pretty much it’s, do this (which seems not good) and I’m in charge.

Since WS have 71% of shares it doesn’t really matter that the other shareholders will be voting, right?

Fair point but either way we are effectively conversing with him albeit perhaps indirectly sorry: posted before seeing BB’s post