Jump to content

International Players Thread


GazzyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, wellgirl said:

Rangers are after him 

Today Rangers. Tomorrow the world (via Rotherham, Partick Thistle, Linfield, Hartlepool, Hamilton and Ayr).

Or maybe that just applies to Jake Hastie.

Miller strikes me as someone who, like Max Johnston, would do better for himself with a move to a European club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, robsterwood said:

Sorry I know it's not well related but if that eng pen is penalty. Defenders not allowed to block shots now? Also mccoist is an English ass kisser 

A Rangers man supporting England?

(Lee Dixon said it was never a pen)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, wellfan said:

McCoist is a prick. 

He always has been. He has the ‘gift of the gab’ though so people fall for his cheeky chappy, everyone’s pal act. He’s false and pretentious and laughs at his own shite patter. I wouldn’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJC said:

He always has been. He has the ‘gift of the gab’ though so people fall for his cheeky chappy, everyone’s pal act. He’s false and pretentious and laughs at his own shite patter. I wouldn’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth. 

His finest moment was "what a header that was....wooooahhhhh, brave as a lion"....but that was 33 years ago

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, grizzlyg said:

His finest moment was "what a header that was....wooooahhhhh, brave as a lion"....but that was 33 years ago

I can’t deny him that one, but even his Co-commentary that day sounded over exaggerated and pretentious. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MJC said:

He always has been. He has the ‘gift of the gab’ though so people fall for his cheeky chappy, everyone’s pal act. He’s false and pretentious and laughs at his own shite patter. I wouldn’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth. 

I'd rather have him commenting than some of those used in the Euros, especially the women, and in particular the American one who seems to think she is an expert on VAR and tries to justify some of the ridiculous decisions we've seen this tournament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Spiderpig said:

I'd rather have him commenting than some of those used in the Euros, especially the women, and in particular the American one who seems to think she is an expert on VAR and tries to justify some of the ridiculous decisions we've seen this tournament.

Add Jenas..zzzzzz..keown.. zzzzz and please pleaseeeee don't start Me on feckin ferdinand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Spiderpig said:

I'd rather have him commenting than some of those used in the Euros, especially the women, and in particular the American one who seems to think she is an expert on VAR and tries to justify some of the ridiculous decisions we've seen this tournament.

Best female pundits were Rachel corsie and leeann crichton 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/11/2024 at 11:57 AM, Spiderpig said:

I'd rather have him commenting than some of those used in the Euros, especially the women, and in particular the American one who seems to think she is an expert on VAR and tries to justify some of the ridiculous decisions we've seen this tournament.

The woman was a retired Fifa Grade referee. I didnt think she tried to justify decisions, more explain why they would be given in line with current IFAB rules. There was one decision in particular (cant remember which) that she explained why the decision had been given in line with the rules, but then said, "if you ask me my personal opinion, you would get a different answer". I think it was to do withba penalty handball incident.

I thought it was actually quite refreahing ro get a referees insight as it explained a lot of stuff.

I think IFAB are the problem. Not the referees.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, joewarkfanclub said:

The woman was a retired Fifa Grade referee. I didnt think she tried to justify decisions, more explain why they would be given in line with current IFAB rules. There was one decision in particular (cant remember which) that she explained why the decision had been given in line with the rules, but then said, "if you ask me my personal opinion, you would get a different answer". I think it was to do withba penalty handball incident.

I thought it was actually quite refreahing ro get a referees insight as it explained a lot of stuff.

I think IFAB are the problem. Not the referees.

She also said that referees at the Euros had been 'recommended' to avoid going against what VAR suggested.  So what was the point of the referee looking at the wee screen? Go against that direction and there goes your chance of the final. The England penalty being a clear example where only VAR and Ian Wright thought the referee had made a clear and obvious error. Even the VAR lady was stunned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dennyc said:

She also said that referees at the Euros had been 'recommended' to avoid going against what VAR suggested.  So what was the point of the referee looking at the wee screen? Go against that direction and there goes your chance of the final. The England penalty being a clear example where only VAR and Ian Wright thought the referee had made a clear and obvious error. Even the VAR lady was stunned.

My biggest gripe with VAR is that they now seem to be actively looking for reasons to disallow goals, yet they still spout the "we only get involved for clear and obvious errors " pish.

Tell me how spending 3 or 4 mins looking at an incident from every angle, slow motion, frame by frame etc, and drawing fancy lines on a screen to register someone off side by millimetres, is clear and obvious. The whole set up is ruining the game and needs binned.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spiderpig said:

My biggest gripe with VAR is that they now seem to be actively looking for reasons to disallow goals, yet they still spout the "we only get involved for clear and obvious errors " pish.

Tell me how spending 3 or 4 mins looking at an incident from every angle, slow motion, frame by frame etc, and drawing fancy lines on a screen to register someone off side by millimetres, is clear and obvious. The whole set up is ruining the game and needs binned.

No argument there......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with SK on this one.

The authorities claimed it wouldn't change the way players played the game, and that VAR wouldn't start refereeing games.

Both claims have proved to be false.

The worst thing for me is it just takes away from the spontaneity of the game - especially when you score and have to wait 2 minutes for a goal to be confirmed.

When you watch leagues with no VAR, even the most controversial flashpoints are over in a few seconds and the players and fans quickly refocus on the game. And everybody just gets back on with it.

VAR is the exact opposite where every incident big and small is tainted by the check and the long wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...