Jump to content

2023/24 ins & outs discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, thewelllfan said:

Well that's why the folk in charge have to start making the right appointments so we don't have to sack them. Whatever idiot gave Alexander that new deal basically crippled the club.

 

 

Yep, I and others made this point a long time ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stuwell2 said:

Firstly I’d say this discussion should be moved to its own thread as it has merit (maybe the mods can sort that) but heres my tuppence worth.

I might be wrong but as the average gate attendance’s includes  the away fans, is it not possible that their crowds are larger because they allow the arse cheeks more than one stand? 
Also, what is the comparison between how many we take to their grounds to what they bring to Fir Park?

They don't they stopped that this season. OF only get one stand in Paisley.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FirParkCornerExile said:

They are welcome to him at that crazy price, the club were quite right not to try and match it. He hasn't kicked a ball since November but you just know he will score against us on Saturday.

I doubt he will feature on sat.... they have plenty strikers. If he does I certainly won't be booing him, but won't be cheering him also.   I will focus on oor lads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, grizzlyg said:

I doubt he will feature on sat.... they have plenty strikers. If he does I certainly won't be booing him, but won't be cheering him also.   I will focus on oor lads

If they have plenty strikers why are they spending seven grand a week on KVV, they obviously don't think too highly of what they have. I think he will come on as a sub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad the club didn't get involved in a crazy bidding war for Van Veen.

Killie gambling that he can hit the ground running and his goals will guarantee them a top 6 spot and possible European place (which on current form they might get anyway).

If they don't however, then its basically money spent for mid table mediocrity like us.

History tells us that people with more money than sense piling cash into a Scottish football club at any level usually ends in tears.

I'm actually more pleased at getting Devine on loan than disappointed at not getting VV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FirParkCornerExile said:

If they have plenty strikers why are they spending seven grand a week on KVV, they obviously don't think too highly of what they have. I think he will come on as a sub.

One league place higher is £65,000. They have Cove Rangers at home in the cup so will be in the Quarter Final draw.

Speculate to accumulate. Van Veen gets them Europe or a semi and they are well up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steelboy said:

One league place higher is £65,000. They have Cove Rangers at home in the cup so will be in the Quarter Final draw.

Speculate to accumulate. Van Veen gets them Europe or a semi and they are well up.

Totally agree. We have chance of cup run and higher league place and also extra insurance against the drop. Big chance missed there. He will get them into Europe and longer in cup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, grizzlyg said:

I just mean I don't think he will be thrown in on Saturday 

Aye McInnes is a smart manager. Van Veen is a confidence player, give him a debut against Cove and if he scores a few he'll push on. Play him against us and he's under pressure which he can't handle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wellgirl said:

Killie are apparently paying anything upwards of 7k a week for Kev. Nothing to do with ambition. It's about what we can afford. 

It is about ambition and speculating. A proven goal scorer for a few grand extra that we could make back by place in table and cup run. Have also money from players we sold wilkinon and Turnbull. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, robsterwood said:

It is about ambition and speculating. A proven goal scorer for a few grand extra that we could make back by place in table and cup run. Have also money from players we sold wilkinon and Turnbull. 

What if he gets injured in his first training session? (I realise this can happen with any signing but if you're paying that much a week its a massive gamble)

Also how do the other players feel knowing the big mental Dutch guy in the corner is on 3 times more than them and he looks half arsed half the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wellup83 said:

I'd rather we didn't break the bank for him. This is nothing but an example of an agent trying to create a bidding war. Let him go.

I'd rather we spent a bit of the budget on keeping Spittal.

I agree, I don't think we should deviate from our wage structure (albeit I have no knowledge of what this is) for anybody, just personal opinion. Spittal has been an excellent signing, quite an underrated player I think. Good luck to the new signings - if Devine can play on either side that gives us some good options in wide areas. I'm quietly optimistic for the remainder of the season, be good to get another forward in before the deadline..! One more would give us a 1st team squad of 23 presuming nobody departs. As others have mentioned, Kettlewell and co. have done a pretty good job of trimming the squad down.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bart Verheul said:

What if he gets injured in his first training session? (I realise this can happen with any signing but if you're paying that much a week its a massive gamble)

Also how do the other players feel knowing the big mental Dutch guy in the corner is on 3 times more than them and he looks half arsed half the time

Any signings a gamble. It may inspire others to reach his level. Done if the on Lian guys will be on good money anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • David locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...