grizzlyg Posted September 29 Report Share Posted September 29 14 hours ago, SteelmaninOZ said: Swear box for Alfred would cover the fines from UEFA 🤪 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted September 29 Author Report Share Posted September 29 3 hours ago, grizzlyg said: Swear box for Alfred would cover the fines from UEFA 🤪 Yes yer effin right I agree 😆 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted October 2 Author Report Share Posted October 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted October 12 Author Report Share Posted October 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Dosser Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 1 hour ago, SteelmaninOZ said: Did you have to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted October 13 Author Report Share Posted October 13 2 hours ago, Happy Dosser said: Did you have to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted Sunday at 12:25 PM Author Report Share Posted Sunday at 12:25 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted yesterday at 05:42 AM Author Report Share Posted yesterday at 05:42 AM Don’t go to Falkirk 🧐 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted yesterday at 06:00 AM Author Report Share Posted yesterday at 06:00 AM For tourists coming to Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted yesterday at 08:34 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 08:34 AM In the great scheme of things, not a huge issue, but that was a stick on red card. Foul was committed well after ball was played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewarkfanclub Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago On 10/19/2026 at 9:34 AM, Kmcalpin said: In the great scheme of things, not a huge issue, but that was a stick on red card. Foul was committed well after ball was played. You talking about the Killie game? At the game I thought it was a red. He was late and his studs were up. Looked like he caught him on the knee. Was hard to tell how much force was used and Im not sure the tv pictures help with that. Given that the ref was right there and immediately gave the red card, Im not sure how they could justify the overturn. PS I think it is an issue. At 1-1 and Killie down to 10 men, you would have to fancy our chances. Particularly as we scored right after that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellfan Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, joewarkfanclub said: Given that the ref was right there and immediately gave the red card, Im not sure how they could justify the overturn. The VAR and AVAR are never required to justify their decision-making in the context of the rules. And when they do, it’s through Collum, who’ll twist and turn things to protect his idiots. There’s zero accountability, no incentive to reflect on their decisions or learn from their mistakes, and therefore no prospect of any improvement. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted 52 minutes ago Report Share Posted 52 minutes ago 6 hours ago, joewarkfanclub said: You talking about the Killie game? At the game I thought it was a red. He was late and his studs were up. Looked like he caught him on the knee. Was hard to tell how much force was used and Im not sure the tv pictures help with that. Given that the ref was right there and immediately gave the red card, Im not sure how they could justify the overturn. PS I think it is an issue. At 1-1 and Killie down to 10 men, you would have to fancy our chances. Particularly as we scored right after that. Yes. When the "challenge" was started, the ball had been played. Stanger had only one intention and that was to injure Lowry, preferably seriously. Born out of frustration? Maybe. Irrespective, clear violent conduct and a straight red. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewarkfanclub Posted 3 minutes ago Report Share Posted 3 minutes ago 46 minutes ago, Kmcalpin said: Yes. When the "challenge" was started, the ball had been played. Stanger had only one intention and that was to injure Lowry, preferably seriously. Born out of frustration? Maybe. Irrespective, clear violent conduct and a straight red. Not sure his intention was to injure Lowry, dont know if he is that sort ofnplayer. But he certainly made no attempt to lower his studs. Whether that was an attempt to protect himself or not, it was certainly endangering an opponent. So I agree, red card was appropriate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.