FirParkCornerExile

Signed up now everything went through OK just waiting now for the game.. Fingers crossed. It a other ROSS County game where expectation high outcome low

Cheers mate I looked at sign up page and couldn't see it will look again

It really doesn't matter a fig, all managers times come and go, where he goes I care not a jot, he is then ex Motherwell and we move on as we always do.

I am in Cyprus until the end of the month does anyone know if you can sign up for Motherwell TV for one month. I really want to see Aberdeen game. Have messaged the club on twitter and got no response. Anyone know or tried it

If thats the case its still disgraceful , fans paying for their inability to their costs under control

Im not really asking them to drop them I'm asking them to match inflation or at least mirror whats going on in the wider society. I would dearly love to know what costs Hearts are having that's increasing 18% annually. If its players wages then that's a choice not costs forced upon them.

Every one of us was fleeced be in no doubt. Pensioner concessions were £21 . In no scenario is charging fans £29 for an SPFL game acceptable , it's utterly disgraceful. All it does is up the ante. Clubs see Hearts getting away with it and it becomes the norm because we will no doubt retaliate in the reverse fixture. Most punters are not getting pay rises above 1% but a Football club thinks a ticket price rise of 18% from last season to this is acceptable. Dick Turpin at least wore a mask.

I was actually calling for Seedorf to be subbed just at the minute he scored. I was probably in a minority of one but although his work rate can't be faulted he is very easily dispossessed and I didn't think much was coming off for him. He's very rough round the edges but when you can compensate with the kind of goals hes scored in the last two weeks not many will complain. We were actually walking away from Tynecastle a wee bit deflated (I know it's mad) had we scored 6 no one could have complained but they always have to put us through the wringer. By time we'd reached the car the deflation had gone LOL

We were shocking defensively and zero threat up front

Cheers mate I'm at least reassured I'm not going mad and wasn't only one to experience it. I did ask the question on the clubs twitter feed but didn't get a response. ** edit Just checked my emails and club have sent confirmation email saying thanks for buying ticket and our existing card has been re-validated. Maybe IT just need to tidy up payment pages on clubs website.

I renewed my season ticket online on Friday. I had been led to believe my existing card would just be re validated for next season. However I could not make payment without clicking "pick up / collection" or "recorded delivery" . Did anyone else experience that. why would those options be mandatory if the existing card is merely re validated. I also got a confirmation email stating the following Tickets can be collected from the ticket office, unless print at home has been selected or postage has been paid for. No print at home is available for Away games, tickets need to be collected from the ticket office unless postage paid for. Print at home tickets:- your ticket will follow in another email. This all seems mad if my existing card is re validated.

i merely point out that most fans are not interested in Thin and Thin

Maybe because Scottish Football is utterly pointless, buggered if i know why im now in my 43rd season. If we are ever to win a cup again we basically need to build that Cup winning team in one close season because as soon as we discover a diamond we need to sell, not always the clubs fault clauses in contracts will dictate. The chances of us recruiting a cup winning team in one close season is virtually ni. We with many other clubs are literally playing to make up numbers , only die hards think thats a product worth paying for and watching.

For the average punter what will be the benefits of the transfer money? It won't realise players much better than we have cos these players have a price tag. It will help develop youth but thats getting to the stage we don't even get their benefit before they are sold and balance sheet improves. Im not decrying the club or the board Im just telling it like it is. The money won't make much difference to what we see on the park.

We do in effect support a balance sheet along with 90% of the rest of Scottish clubs its a model that has remarkably kept punters coming back but does little to attract new and floating fans and never will do. If you told golfing fans only two players would win the majors for the next forty years support would plummet from current levels.

Exactly hes an ex Motherwell player now don't. Mind you none of the Celtic fans seem to have picked up on the "next stage of my development comment" he doesn't see Celtic anything other than a stepping stone. They are just a bigger diddy club that feeds bigger clubs

I suspect we wont be spending any of it on transfer fees .. transfer fees go toward better class of player who demand higher wages than we pay.

No way should he get pelters folk need to remember he didnt need to sign a 3 year contract he did so out of a love of the club and to safeguard us he could have done what Hastie did and we get fuck all.

if true our club owes a huge debt to David Turnbull he signed a 3 year contract when he didn't need to but basically to ensure the club was taken care of

i find the "kept up to date with transfer developments" very odd ... why would they want to be kept up to date? .....so when someone they don't like comes in they can say we want him. If Man City want him they could get him they know he's available so what is there to be kept up to date with

He should worry not ending up playing for those tramps. David Turnbull will do alright wherever he goes and so will Motherwell. The facts hes not "Celtic Minded" and star struck by the manky mob just makes the process that wee bit more enjoyable.

Maybe he's like many of us and detests the Green and Grey Hoop mob. LOL

Id seriously love to know what McGhee thought he could do with Bob Malcolm a serious lump of wood before he signed and by the time he left a lump of wood would have been better. Every manager will "think" a player will improve what they have even when the facts put in front of them have a serious chance of proving that assumption wrong.

your splitting hairs whether he was suspended 4 or 5 days before doesnt change a thing. Hibs are highly unlike;y to have rushed out to sign Bigi the day after Lennon left and have it all settled in 4 days. Anyway even if they did my original point stands experienced managers are capable of and often do sign utter shite.

Bigi was signed by Hibs for 31st Jan deadline, Hibs and Lennon parted company on 30th January. i think its pretty safe to say Lennon would have been involved in that signing.