weeyin

You do know that means at least one of them will drop something?

That is a good question. I always assumed D), but it hasn't been spelled out.

I think you're right. If we get our act together and do take over the club, I'm sure we can find qualified people like Derek Weir who'd be willing to step in. I imagine there are a number of qualified candidates who could run a football club that never fulfill that ambition because they don't have the resources available to invest that is normally required.

They took live questions first because they knew the people that emailed questions would never know if they were answered - thanks to the complete lack of access for the long distance members.

Sadly, that is true for most clubs around the globe. I was talking more about the operational side of things.

Unless the WS has enough members willing to vote out an experienced Board of Directors, we won't really be running the club - we will just own it. This isn't going to be one of the those "vote on every decision" kind of deals. It should be (I'm hoping) more like the Spanish model - which seems to be working OK.

Looking forward to the live broadcast...

Don't know about that, but it was definitely the booze that killed him.

Ian Archer for me.

I'd have him back if he was capable of reproducing the form he showed the first time around. His drop down divisions definitely affected his performances (as you would expect). If you want to improve or even maintain your form, you need to be up against players better than you every week.

Rangers aren't popular with the Celtic fans - do you like them too?

Aye, when he puts his mind to it, he looks like a top qulaaity player, but since he arrived, those games seem few and far between. No doubt his experience is good to have on the park and around the training field, but agree he has been disappointing.

Does it not have to be deliberate hand ball to be a penalty? Or are there other clauses in that rule that would apply? It's a long time since I read the rule book.

I'd be very surprised if that happened, tbh. The chance was there when Les stepped in to take over the club, and the queue seemed to be one person long. Just extracting the current Society from the club and reworking the existing agreements would be challenging.

Maybe he's worried nobody else noticed.

I don't think anyone in the club is unaware of that particular problem. I said at the start of the season, it was unrealistic to expect some instant or massive improvement with basically the same core of players. It's going to take some hard work and a little more time before we are even a middling SPFL team and finding our scoring is a key part of that puzzle. It's an added stress on the defence who know that conceding one goal at the moment means it's unlikely we'll pick up all 3 points.

The Society hasn't serviced any of the loan, has it? Or did I miss that.

If our defenders had read the opinions of Vigurs on here, they probably thought he wasn't worth marking.

+1 on the playmaker. We have struggled to find a consistent performer in that role. A fit Vigurs being the closest in recent times.

Apparently we finished second bottom last season, well behind ICT.

Aye, that was a long drive home.

Easiest job on the park for me is in the slot behind the strikers. Space, time and if you make a mistake, you get applauded for trying instead of slated.

You're right. Sportsmanship is going to be the death of our game.

In a game where there are many average players and managers whose talents are overestimated by the media, Yogi's talents seem to fly under the radar. His record holds up well against his peers.

Glory hunters.