weeyin

From their forums it sounds like they are the Spanish version of us: And just for steelboy

No way we could afford Beattie and, tbh, despite the doubters on here, not a position we need to address compared to midfield.

I think if you bothered to check my posts over the years, my comments on the team performances have been pretty reasoned and balanced. Or even just my comments on the Ross County game. And there was no criticism of the team from me for the first leg. I don't think, for example, being disappointed with Hutchy for making exactly the same mistake 2 games in a row is particularly harsh or having it both ways. I would say that was a constructive comment that we need to learn from our mistakes. In the match thread, I laid out the reasons for my pride, delight (and yes) disappointment at the performance in the tie. It's OK to have more than one thought or emotion at a time. Sorry if you find that having it 'both ways', but not everything in life is black and white.

Fixed it for you

I don't want any tie that gives the English media a chance to patronize us if we lose.

I'm sorry, but this just smacks of the 'plucky Motherwell' headlines we are likely to see in tomorrow's papers. I have no problem in with being proud of the team for their achievements, and both amazed and delighted we made a CL game in my lifetime. That doesn't mean there isn't some disappointment in some of the errors that we made. When we beat Hearts at Tynecastle last season to set ourselves up for 3rd place, I don't remember any chat about them being bigger and stronger and costing more than Motherwell can ever dream of (even though all 3 are true). There is no shame in losing over the 2 legs to a team of that calibre. There is no shame in being proud of what we have achieved. I don't, however, think it's unreasonable to be annoyed at the nature of the first goal we conceded tonight or concerned that we are still lacking a cutting edge (whether against Greeks or SPL opponents). Remember, we a have a number of players with European experience at club and U-21 level and would expect them to be just a little more savvy sometimes. That doesn't take away from the enjoyment of the tie, it just sets up more talking points for the upcoming games - including lessons to take into our Europa Cup adventure.

If the opinion is along the lines of "any man under 40 could play as well as Higdon", I think 'muppet' is being generous.

The fact that he didn't learn his lesson from last week is sufficiently worrying.

I don't think that was the plan in the first half. When Aberdeen were successful in Europe, they played this way for all their away games. First half, shut up shop - second half, open up. Not to say we are going to do anything dramatic tonight, but base on our propensity to lose early/slack goals, no harm in starting off with these tactics.

McCall said that while we were looking to score first, he wasn't necessarily looking to score early. So the plan is working

Too expensive (and they are professional players). For our budget we need some of your 'any man under 40' contacts that we can pick up cheap. No pros or ex-pros.

Which one of these readily available goal-scoring machines do you suggest we sign up as a replacement? I'm sure Motherwell, and most SPL clubs, would love to know.

They are all following the party line: It's very hot Be patient First goal important Still have Europa Cup

http://www.thefirstrow.eu/ I expect more to follow.

http://www.thefirstrow.eu/ has a stream listed for the game.

Unfortunately, I couldn't find a decent colour picture of the tower - probably some out there if I looked hard enough.

Not giving up the day job!

Are the proceeds form these going to the club or to the testimonial fund?

Sitting at work with a dodgy internet stream is the way to go! (At least that is what I keep telling myself )

So the board is willing to risk the entire financial and footballing strategies of our club over a few thousand quid? I still can't see it.

No idea what the result will be, but no way we don't score in this game.

No disrespect to Phil and his family, but why?

At a time when development of youngsters is at a premium, why would the board go against the judgement of McCall and, in particular, Young? Doesn't make sense to me.

Ultimately, I think we are still lacking a bit of match sharpness due, in part, to limited competitive game time with our restricted pre-season schedule. Time will tell, of course, but regaining that cutting edge is something that will hopefully return after a couple more run outs.

I don't disagree - and maybe the seat on the bench helped him a focus a bit more when he came on. Of course, McCall might just have been saving him for the second leg!