weeyin

Robinson knew how to get the best out of Hastie, but wingers seems to have gone out of fashion in recent years. He may well have had a better career if he had stayed on at Fir Park for another season - or he may have faded once the opposition figured him out. Brown looks like he wants to play 2 wide men at Ayr, so if he can kickstart his career anywhere it might be at Somerset Park.

For anyone that undertstands American betting odds*, Rangers are -500 and Motherwell are +1140 (* I am not one of those people)

Jake Hastie on as a sub to replace Jamie Murphy in the Ayr Utd game this evening. Murphy had a good game, Hastie didn't do much.

We quite regularly pick up points against St Johnstone, Hearts and Aberdeen so even if we get nothing against Rangers I'm not sharing the fear.

"To be honest, and I've said this before, I'm not here to complain or want anybody to feel sorry for me, we've got to perform at our best or we won't take anything from the game" (Although I usually enjoy listening to his pressers during my tea break).

ANYONE SAVVY ENOUGH TO SEND EMAILS IN ALL CAPS IS SAVVY ENOUGH TO BUY A TICKET ONLINE

I think that was 100% dependent on a sponsor (or "partner") paying for it.

And I don't get the love for Blaney, as he makes just as many mistakes. He passes straight to opponents in danger areas 2 or 3 times a game, loses his man too often for my liking and has the same brain fart ratio as all our central defenders from last season.

On the plus side, we are a much more solvent club. I read that in 2023, Everton hit the impressive debt of £1 billion, even with their dodgy accountants.

"Everton test will prepare us for Rangers Hampden clash, says Motherwell boss" Correct.

Drawing with County at home, beating Rangers at Hampden and then turning in an abject performance to lose the cup game against Killie sounds like the most likely Motherwellish set of results.

When you're turning over 7 or 8 first team players, there's no point in trying to do a like-for-like replacement, unless it's a keeper. You need to play to the strengths of the new recruits.

Or that if we hate someone, we need to post that on here to be sure they know?

Not me. Something I'd be interested in, but time (and timezone) means it's not viable for the foreseeable future.

Does the club run the pie stall?

That's the kind of game-1-and-a-month-until-the-window-closes assessment we know and love on here.

I hope so. I was all in favour of a complete change of personnel in defence, and the Casey/Blaney combo hasn't filled me with any more confidence so far this season.

I like Wilson, but he's very much a work in progress. Which of course, is to be expected. His control is miles off sometimes when he tries to rush things. Good energy though, and he's getting into the right positions at the right times. Looking forward to seeing how he develops with more game time.

You know it's going to be a long day when Miller starts the game by passing to County players and papping it straight out the park. Take your pick...

We've often got the best out of players by playing to their strengths. Then when they move on, their new teams try to squeeze them into an existing system with less success. I'm not saying that will happen with Spittal, but it certainly happened when Sutton left us for Hearts and even - to a lesser extent - Faddy at Everton.

And Ross MacIver almost matched it, except for a quite incredible save from the keeper.

Was he not one of the players you used to slag off on a regular basis? Also, we didn't get rid of him - St Mirren signed him on a pre-contract. I liked O'Hara, but he never played as well for us as he does for St Mirren. Better fit with Robinson's style (a style you also used to slag off on a regular basis - with good reason, because it was pretty brutal at times).

Good luck editing SK!

It's not 100% clear, but I thought " I wish the new Club Chair and Board every success in what will be an exciting next chapter for the Club." suggested he was stepping away from the Board too.

Pretty sure professional sports coaches understand that. The facts still show, however, that rarely (if ever) have we released a 17 year old that went on to play at a higher level than us when they were in their 20s. Of course, there may be an exception from time to time, but I'd struggle to think of any youngster we released in the last 20 years that proved us wrong.