Jump to content

weeyin

Moderator
  • Posts

    23,313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    564

Posts posted by weeyin

  1. Some interesting (and controversial) options discussed in today's Scotsman :lol:

     

    As for last night, I'm with fatcalf. If there is a fixed timeline for the creation of an expanded league then I could just about buy into that. Otherwise it will just be a sop to the fans and clubs that are demanding expansion and will never happen.

  2. Easy enough to say when your sitting at your keyboard 5000 miles away.

     

    Its a bit different when you are wrapped up in the atmosphere, the guy makes the same mistakes over and over again and then starts gesticulating at the crowd as though its their fault.

    5000 miles away is an even poorer argument. I have seen plenty of bad keepers at Fir Park - John Gardiner being the worst - and plenty of bad players in every other position. I have yelled abuse at some of them and laughed at others.

     

    The horror of Smith gesticulating at some mouthy fans doesn't even register on my outrage scale. Fans that can dish it out, but can't take it, makes me laugh though.

  3. The people that pay his wages??
    Poor argument. Even if it was true that his wages were funded 100% by the set of fans that yelled dog's abuse (which they were not), you'd have to be a precious wee petal to become so outraged at the minor retaliation.
  4. Yet another huge, bitter, and possibly even embarrassing blow to the Motherwell fans.
    Oh come on. It has given you another opportunity to come on here with your Victor Meldrew impression. How can that be disappointing for you?
  5. Is the rule even legal? Surely it is restricting the boy's right to work or some such EEC nonsense?

    EEC? You've been out the country too long, my friend. It's the EU now.

     

    There are a few FIFA/UEFA rules that would fall foul of EU laws, but football has been granted some exceptions. I guess this must be one of them.

  6. To be fair, we have been pretty astute at working our way through the loopholes of cross border transfers in the past few seasons, leaving more than a few English clubs ranting about how we ripped them off.

  7. I'm sorry but just because it was an emergancy loan why would anyone assume that it doesn't count as playing for a team :lol:
    Because, the English FA at least, regards that as an exception to the rule.

     

    "An FA spokesman said: ‘Emergency loans don’t count when calculating the number of clubs a player has played for as he remains under contract to his parent club.’"

  8. Surely some of these players only require a fee of £10k - £20k which you make back by paying lower wages than these loan guys... And if it works out you have a sellable asset at the end of it... too much like long-term thinking maybe.

    Sure it used to be that we even took a few players from the juniors and they worked out well but now it's the opposite, we sign up youngsters, keep 1 or 2 after the age of 21 and the rest end up dropping down.

    Whether that is true or not, the board has a long standing philosophy of not paying transfer fees. I can see the logic in that as it frees up more funds to pay wages. Guys like Skippy and Porter have been brought in this way and been very salable, as have players developed by our youth system. So it's difficult to argue against it's effectiveness.
  9. "This rule dictates that a player can be registered with a maximum of three clubs during one season but can only play for two of them — with the sole exception of a move between clubs with overlapping seasons."

     

    Does the SPL starting before the EPL not count?

  10. All those players, especially the Livingston lot went for money - we don't have that!
    In a nutshell. The reason we have gone for managers who can bring in loans and frees from the English lower leagues is because any decent lower div player in Scotland usually requires a transfer fee.
  11. Gannon went for a job interview down south, without the clubs permission, the week before the 2-2 Accies match at New Douglas.
    That is a story I have seen mentioned on here. I have seen said-same story debunked on here. Both from people 'in-the know'.
  12. Wow a 34 year old english basement league journeyman and we cant even afford to sign HIM permanently, added to Kenny Black as our new assistant and Im not sure I can handle the excitement, just how much lower are we going to get?
    Maybe we don't want to sign him permanently until we see how he shapes up. Or maybe McCall has other targets in his sights for the summer transfer window and doesn't want to tie up funds at this stage of the season.
  13. If we saw prices being lowered there would be increased attendances means more money spent at food kiosks, more shirts being sold, more programmes being punted etc.
    Intuitively, that makes sense. However, there are a finite number of people who will come to a Motherwell game on any given week, and history has shown that reducing the prices doesn't necessarily attract the necessary increase in crowd to make it worthwhile.

     

    I'm all for a drop in price, btw - but realise that it is a tricky balancing act. A more even distribution of revenue would doubtless help in funding such an initiative as the reliance on gate receipts would be reduced.

  14. the germans have low gate prices because there's 90 million of them and they have a massive tv deal and sponsorship.
    Indeed. Found these figures on the web:

     

    "A holy trinity comprising match-day revenue (€424m), sponsorship receipts (€573m) and broadcast income (€594m) is the main contributor to the Bundesliga's €1.7bn turnover."

     

    Over 1 billion EUR from sponsorships and broadcast rights.

×
×
  • Create New...