Onthefringes

Here we go again... My post was a reply to the question being asked 'which game?'. Without the need to be superior - quip made referring to the conjecture referred to the previous day's match. No claims from me that anything untoward has gone on you'll see, but, batter in if it suits your obvious seethe at not being in the loop.

Motherwell Miners have defenders streets ahead of Kerr, yet, we've had others advocating he must get a run in a natural position!

Don't have to be Einstein, given the punch drunk like performance yesterday...

Suspect we'll be looking at the goalkeeping department...

You've really not got a handle on this have you? No bank debt, creditors paid in full... Who is likely to put us into administration? And for the avoidance of doubt, the scheme has worked with another dipping into the reserves at the moment...

Really? May well be the case, but, on the other hand, can we afford to keep them on? I'd expect funds to be found if it meant securing the right persons for the job.

Seeing as it's not the board, per se, who are conducting interviews... Thought you would know that from the lofty stance you normally take.

Why? He was only given an interview as a favour to an agent

As they assume the position, current free fall could well be record breaking given they'd be the only team to have amassed a certain level of points in the first quarter & yet fail to land a top six berth. Weren't the best team we have faced no matter what some mentioned on here. Whilst they have sold merchandise with 'Pride of Lanarkshire' on the back of two poorer than poor performances from us & talked of European qualification... rumours abound of the cash that's washed over there propping them up may well run out

Fully understand that - wasnt questioning its use, but, the claim made by a previous poster

Eh? Read my post again... I'm well aware any clause is only as good as the people signed up to it. The post was in relation to a remark 'Yesterdays news was almost certainly leaked to the media by one of the three parties involved anyway'. By that reckoning, Benefactor, Society & the club. Benefactor insisted on confidentiality, can't see the Society leaking information given the lengths they've gone to recently to keep their side of the bargain, so was the poster suggesting the club? Our information was from sources within & no reason to doubt. I too am also comfortable with the way the club & society have gone about their business.

Almost certainly? Just as many thought - the confidentiality clause is much like Mr & Mrs Claus... a myth? Oh, given who relayed the information, it's a lot more credible than your conjecture.

Let's not be kidded - this has been leaked by weegie media to derail progress at our club. Fuels spurious claim from the orcs that 'he holds shares at ours'. It's a loan from what information we have been given, you know, a thing that is borrowed, especially a sum of money that is expected to be paid back with interest? Hello? Mike Ashley? A truly despicable lot...

I'd wager he's wrong...

Aye, that the Society reached the figure quoted to them earlier this year as they have stated on this 'ere message board before it became known additional income would be required, well, that and something like the... ...getting pressed

Fairly confident neither are on the shortlist... Oops, cat out the bag!

It's this intensity that made him out as erratic as Jim Gannon...

'days before he was due to get interviewed', 'declined their invitation' - I'll be stunned if that was the case.

Butcher himself said he was finished with the game in Scotland. Bryan Jackson been taking his coaching badges like? Let's get it right - we are in no danger of administration. Only person who can put us there is John Boyle so highly unlikely... Stop feeding the porridge dribblers on here. One thing we can be sure of is downsizing regardless who is the custodian(s) of the club. The managerial appointment is the most crucial I've known given the nature of the change required.

Latest of the latest...

Just adding what may well be the absurd to the original claim.

Look, things are bad enough without this being passed off as fact. Our information differs greatly & given who it was from confirms the club stance & information they trotted out at the time. Also, that'll be why his best mate threw his toys out his cot at him or another of their mates not getting offered contracts? So much so, even landed one on the chin of the manager?

Agreed, similar thinking, could have worded my response a little differently.