Kmcalpin

Just listening to Hammy's interview and I'm not sure what to make of it in terms of transfers. It will be a difficult window, thats for sure. Maybe he's just playing his cards close to his chest but its slightly corncerning that he refers to bringing in maybe 1 or 2 and having to be creative. Make of that what you will.

Good stuff Ian. I can now access the site via Android again.

Like many fans I don't like postponements in principle and Friday falls into that category. However, in pure footballing terms, I'd rather face Sevco at Ibrox than Kilmarnock at home in our first fixture after the World Cup. The Killie game is more important to us. My only fear of Sevco being our first game back would be our match fitness for Livingston.

Thats Scott Fox left the club. He was never really going to feature.

Good post and I agree with most of it. However concentrating on schools is a huge no no. Teachers stopped taking an active interest in schools football years ago and why should they? Where would the money to pay for it come from? It would have to come from the SFA coffers, as Local Authorities would not be interested. A good idea though if it can be funded properly.

You're plumbing the depths now.

I agree with much of that. Do you though, subscribe to any TV sports channels?

Televised games were as predictable as night follows day.

Presumably we have insurance to cover this kind of situation? Not the first time we've suffered frozen & burst pipes if thats the cause.

A good summing up. We have 4 very tough games coming up (aren't they all?) including two extremely tricky home fixtures before Christmas. I'm pinning a lot on January signings as they could well make or break our season, as you say. The central defence, midfield and strikeforce all need urgent attention. Whether that objective is feasible in a notoriously difficult window is another matter entirely.

Or Joe Efford.

I didn't find the review to be that illuminating to be honest. Stevie didn't tell us much more than than we already knew or surmised.

I'm not overly bothered who the opposotion is to be honest. Whats important to me is that its another opportunity to keep players match fit against a decent of opposition, end of. If we were playing Huddersfield, Crewe, Rotherham or Raith Rovers I'd be just as happy.

According to Callum Davidson in the Courier, we are playing St Johnstone in a friendly.

Ian Maxwell, the SFA's Chief Executive insists VAR is working. Interestingly he says "I would disagree that they [fans] don't think it's working" when asked about those criticisms. "I'd say they have issues potentially with the time it takes, potentially with the communication opportunities we've got within inside the stadiums - and those are challenges we need to face." It seems he is speaking for us, but has he actually asked the fans? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63812494

I thought originally it could be a tricky game and we might flounder, but really if we play to form we should skate it.

January 2000 I think. Game was called off mid match because of the gales. After the game there was quite a bit of trouble in front of the ground. We then drew the game at Arbroath; the rearranged replay at FP was called off; and we won final game only to be knocked out by Ayr in the next round. Quite a saga.

Careful David. Your comment is becoming a bit personal. We really need to foster and encourage discussion on here not suppress or stifle it. I may not always agree with MJC_mk11, but he/she does make some valid points and I like reading all points of view, especially those which differ from mine. If you disagree with a comment all you have to do is argue against it and leave it at that. Park it and move on. As for Louis Moult, I don't think he's finished but his contribution is limited and he hasn't done much to the present. As a loan signing he hasn't done a lot so far, although he put in a good shift on Saturday. Given Hammy's comments about him and his limited appearances to date, there was no way I thought he'd start on Saturday, let alone last 90+ minutes but I was wrong.

Really? Not as clear cut as you make out. Are we playing the strikers in the best formation that suits their abilities? Are they being given decent support and ammunition? Does that explain a malfunctioning midfield that doesn't support the strikers and doesn't protect the defence? Does that explain a seemingly disorganised defence?

Hammy has said recently that we have kept money back for January signings. How that translates into actual bodies is another matter entirely. Its not an easy window.

I remember a few years ago that the Police stopped access to the East Stand because the automatic turnstile counters indicated that it was full to capacity, despite there being empty seats. I think that was put down to a technical fault. Presumably now, someone in authority can tell pretty much in real time the number of ticket holders in the stadium? Like Spiderpig, I am very sceptical that an extra 1,000 fans could gain access to the South Stand. Thats an extra 21% over capacity.

Good post. I'm not suggesting that we chuck in young lads willy nilly and in the deep end but 2/3 minutes here and there would not be amiss. Also, I'm not suggesting that Dean Cornelius is the answer to all our problems, but you're right he gives us something different and would have given us fresh impetus and supported Moult and KVV better yesterday.

Good post OTF. I was at the game yesterday and we deserved our draw, which I thought was beyond us before kick off. St Johnstone had the better of the first half and we had the upper hand in the second and finished the game quite strongly. Both teams had their strengths as expected and we tried to play the better football whilst Saints played their usual game - hard working, organised, solid and streetwise. They had the better leading up play, courtesy of our midfield and defence, whilst we created the better chances. Fortunately they were toothless up front. We were totally exposed down the flanks, especially on our left side and more clinical opponents would have taken more advantage of the space we offered them. I'd hate to be playing in our central defence right now - no protection from the front or sides. Defencewise we were unorganised and shambolic. I thought substitutions to bring on fresh legs, especially in midfield were required midway through the 2nd 45 were needed but only Shields appeared. I'm not a fan of 4-2-3-1 or similar at all. Maybe thats unfair of me - perhaps its just the way we implement it or we don't have/play the players to suit it. Up front I was pleasantly surprised to see Moult start and last 90 minutes and he worked damned hard. The problem was that he was too isolated. As a few others have said, KVV was played far too deep and he didn't link up with Louis. Not KVV's fault. Moult is not a lone striker; thats not his game. I have to question our coaching. Week after week, the same problems manifest themselves i.e. we appear disorganised defensively, midfield doesn't function and the lone striker is left isolated. Thats not the fault of individual players. Two main positives for me: an unexpected point, and Moult getting 90 minutes Finally, the less said about Nick Walsh the better.

Assuming the worst case scenario comes to pass, and based on recent selections, Hammy will probably still opt for one striker, most likely Shields, as Moult is most unlikely to start. Morris could well start. Hopefully though a young lad or two will get some game time depending on how things are going - even a couple of minutes would signal Hammy's commitment to youth.

I agree but how does he do that? If he comments, the press and media will largely censor/suppress it and won't report it or highlight it.