David

What's the script with Clarky anyway? He signed a three year deal with Bristol City in June 2009, didn't he? Has it been renewed?

Have you heard something?

Not sure if it's been posted, but the Well Society guidance document has been added to the official website;

I don't see that as a possibility. The current cost of a PATG seat is already pretty high, and a raise in ticket prices would simply drive support away, making any such raise counter productive. Put simply, we'll need to just look at cutting our cloth to suit. As someone mentioned previously, the other clubs will have to do the same, so it's not as if we'll be falling behind everyone else. Also, doesn't the current TV deal have a year or so still left on it? If that is the case we have enough wriggle room to allow those with high wages to either see out their contracts or get moved on.

I'd hang back on any such talk for the moment. All of that is just tabloid chit chat. What we do know for a fact is that the club are giving the members of the Society a say in how this pans out, which is all we can really ask for at present.

That's what I was thinking. A valid UK passport is all you need for travel within the EU.

Joe (or anyone else who has the info pack), how much information is actually given? Are we talking a small booklet or a single letter going over a few points? Also, what's the general feeling on the tone of the information? Is it portraying both negative & positive points of a 'no' vote? Or is basically just highlighting what we stand to lose without actually mentioning the possible benefits?

Let's wait & see if Jenno is actually leaving first.

Info on the United vote;

Not taking into account the fact that a stunt such as that, if ever brought to light, would mean the end for the 'Well Society and everyone associated with the club board. There's no way they take such a risk. They simply wouldn't have gone down the 'Well Society voting road and just come to a conclusion themselves.

I seriously doubt that the board will see the Society vote one way and go against them if it comes to it.

Even if our club votes against them joining but more SPL clubs vote in favour?

No, but it means that Faddy, and other club legends who signed up can. I wouldn't put it past our media to try and find out who among them voted against the NEWCO and making it public knowledge.

I'm not sure that would work to be honest, as anyone could easily vote, making it just as valid as the other poll we already have.

After the uncertainty of the past month or so I can honestly say that I'm no longer as concerned as to what the other clubs vote. My club is doing the right thing, which is all I want.

After reading his statement regarding the Murdoch media empire I'm thinking we should get Romanov involved in the independence "yes" campaign!

You can add Hearts to the 'no' column (I think!);

Yeah, it's pretty much all you can ask for I think. I'll certainly be renewing now.

You think so? Their fans seem to think otherwise from what I've seen!

All relevant posts have been moved to the thread created by the clubs official account.

Merged with the thread made by the club account. All relevant posts were moved over.

With the recent announcement by the board regarding the newco vote, is there anyone else out there like me who was unsure of putting their money into the club that has now decided to do so? Or is there anyone who thinks that the announcement will see them buy a membership when they weren't even considering it yesterday? Just out of interest...

With the recent announcement by the board he's free to hang around the shop for as long as he likes now

This may also be a good move to get anyone who is considering getting a Well Society membership to actually do so.