GrahamH

Who wins on penalties?

I think it's pretty obvious who he means. Not that I agree.

Constructive dismissal and wrongful dismissal are 2 entirely different things.

Did McGhee not just say Samson will start the season as number 1? That doesn't necessarily mean he'll remain so.

I agree that it should have meant something to the players but Celtic were always going to be more up for it. They needed a win like that or their title party was going to go down like a lead balloon. Let the Celtic fans think they're world beaters, we beat them when it mattered.It's also good management. No point risking having to pay a win or goal bonus for a meaningless game

Of course it means something to Celtic. That's why the score is what it is. Take Hammell and Lasley out the team and we're capable of taking a doing off any team in the league.

When the only team that's up for the game is the one with better quality and more experience a doing is also on the cards. Celtic can afford to take risks on the hunt for more goals so it could get worse. Last time we played them at Parkhead when both teams were up for it we won. That helped us get top six and at least an extra couple of hundred thousand so I'm happy with that. This game means nothing.

How much have they been offered to stay and who could we get for the equivalent? I assume you must know.

Looks like they've had a man sent off. That must be why the crowd are so excited.

For a broken ankle?

Another low in a shocking performance was that not one of our players had a go at McCulloch for it.

You couldn't be more wrong. I made one comment and then replied to a couple of responses to what I had said. What's desperate about that? I'm not in the slightest bit worried about Alan Burrows being GM or the job he is doing. By all accounts he's Motherwell to the core and is putting his heart and soul into the job and I applaud that. That's my first comment on the job he is doing so what is the story I am trying to make?It's people like yourself who seem desperate to keep something going by quoting me and talking crap which will always get a response.

Everything's up for debate. Not having the slightest clue about what you're debating has never been an issue on here before.

Now that my ignorance has been exposed I have no comeback. You win.

Knowing that the list of applicants has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not somebody is qualified for a job doesn't really make me an oracle.

His CV was pretty much there for all to see before he got the job. What would the list of applicants have to do with anything? You seem to be very ignorant of how these things work....

This is no slight on the job he's doing but if he wasn't a fan he wouldn't be doing the job as he wouldn't have had the qualifications or experience to apply. How he's done since he got the job is up for debate.

How long have Archibald and Hartley had to build their squads?

He's getting paid as a squad player the same as all the other guys who don't start games. Would you rather we just had 11 players?

How much is he getting and who could we get for that wage?

I appreciate that McGhee's made some dodgy selections and substitutions but should he not at least be allowed to bring in a few of his own players before being told to F off? McGhee's big on being able to trust his players and from the last week it doesn't look as if there's too many there that he can trust to perform for 90 minutes.

Disappointing to hear we were close to getting him on a permanent deal only to lose out at the last minute. Hopefully we can get somebody else in pretty quickly.

Don't know if it's been mentioned but extended highlights are on Alba tonight at 10pm.

Baraclough didn't exactly improve the team despite having money to spend so I don't think he simply under-estimated how shite the team was. Despite all his claims about what he was going to do, he was a poor manager.

How much have you put on?