Jump to content

2012/13 Ins & Outs Thread


SCDave
 Share

Recommended Posts

With the board having made it clear that our budget was cut due to the loss of two home games against Rangers, will funds now be made available following the League Cup draw which should make up for a season's shortfall (ignoring TV money). I can't remember the figure we were missing out on from the home games but, assuming their support turns out to make a point, we should be expecting £250k-£300k. I'm sure some of it will be squirrelled away but hopefully it will allow us to bring in one or two out of contract players.

The board have already made funds available to bring in at least one player, dare say they are still available and hopefully things will happen

 

the initial budget cuts were because of a loss last year of a few hundred thousand (lost figure just now)

 

the Rangers debacle and the figures distributed showed how precarious our finances had got to again due to living hand to mouth

 

I'd be happy to see a couple of players added to the squad, but based on only the revised budget from the summer not based on a cup game that hasnt happened yet

 

 

Agreed.

 

With this cup game, prob TV money to go with it, the Panathiniakos game, TV deal in place and the extra match v Levante, how can we be much worse off from last year???

 

Stop pissin about n get Faddy signed up!!

two home games were already in the budget so cannot be added as extra income, albeit welcome Panathanaikos and Levante games didnt exactly bring in budget changing incomes , the cup game has the potential to deliver a boost

 

albeit it seems previously we have budgeted for cup progression?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the loss is a predicted loss for the next set of accounts to be published. The last ones announced we made a profit and that profit covers the predicted loss for this year. The budget cuts were to ensure we didn't make a loss again because we didn't have anyway of covering further losses.

 

Anyway I could be confused but I think that covers it. I will try and dig out some articles to prove my theory or more likely disprove the theory. Anyway with Clancy rejecting his contract we actually cut more than needed. We also made a fair chunk from the European games so I suspect there is a bit of money out there.

 

Having said all that we are trying to build a fund that allows us to cover any sudden drop in income, that includes society money but also a cut of any bonus prize money, I don't think anyone can argue with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Just to clarify The profit was for 2010/11. The loss if for 2011/12.

To avoid a loss 2012/13 we had to cut 1/4 million an we have done that.

The Euro money was a wee bit extra so we can now sign another and still put a wee bit by for a rainy day which we need to do because we have zero overdraft facitlies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify The profit was for 2010/11. The loss if for 2011/12.

To avoid a loss 2012/13 we had to cut 1/4 million an we have done that.

The Euro money was a wee bit extra so we can now sign another and still put a wee bit by for a rainy day which we need to do because we have zero overdraft facitlies?

That's what I was meaning, cheers thumbup.gif. The loss for 2011/12 is still only predicted and won't be announced until early next year is that right? (I'm no saying there might not be a loss by the way just that we won't know the actual figure until then)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers Netherton that refreshes the mind a little

 

the loss might only be predicted, but the events have already occurred and with the lack of transfers out and the rest thats went on it would be quite a misjudgment on the boards part if we report a significant profit ( we can hope)

 

Just to clarify The profit was for 2010/11. The loss if for 2011/12.

To avoid a loss 2012/13 we had to cut 1/4 million an we have done that.

 

The Euro money was a wee bit extra so we can now sign another and still put a wee bit by for a rainy day which we need to do because we have zero overdraft facitlies?

 

almost (remember the quoted article was pre Rangers liquidation)

 

but after cutting the Budget by £200-300k, the Rangers Debacle occurred

 

Leaving the already cutback budget with another chunk missing which with some facts the Well society members received and some speculation still leaves us down on that target going into the season even with two Euro games (and probably the reason money circled to go towards contracts for Craggs, Jennings etc disappeared at that time)

 

now the board have mentioned that cup games make all the difference and can deliver better rewards than placing higher up the league

 

IF we receive 35-40% of a good gate in the Ibrox cup game that goes someway towards easing the concern

 

but as so often mentioned the requirement to finance the strategic reserve due to the lack of financial backing is/should be the priority

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The loss for 2011/12 is still only predicted and won't be announced until early next year is that right? (I'm no saying there might not be a loss by the way just that we won't know the actual figure until then)

 

Our financial year ended on 31 May. The annual accounts will be presented to the shareholders in the next month or two - possibly November? Presumably the Directors now know the exact figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Lawless goes on to a better level than us or even very well at about our upper level SPL then fair play to him but it really will be about a first in about 25 years someone we've let go has went on to excel. Least that I can think of.

 

I don't think he was let go because we couldn't afford him, think McCall would have felt he wasn't going to do the

business. It isn't like younger players aren't getting a chance that is for sure.

My understanding is that Lawless was going to get his chance when the window shut In January after Murphy signed for Blackpool, when that deal fell through it was too late for Lawless to go out on loan and he ended up kicking his heels for 6 months. When McCall realised that the whole SPL summer shambles meant that there was no guarantee he would be a regular this season, he allowed Lawless to leave to give him a chance to get first team football. A chance he has so far grasped with both hands. Whether he goes on toa great career then who knows, but good luck to the lad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our financial year ended on 31 May. The annual accounts will be presented to the shareholders in the next month or two - possibly November? Presumably the Directors now know the exact figures.

Cool, just with the last ones being released in February I assumed (wrongly) that it would be the same again this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard Andy Dorman's name mentioned. Recently released and a number of SPL teams are looking at him. He must be close to 30 now right enough, then again his goals record from midfield for a shit St.Mirren team(aren't they all?) in the SPL was pretty dam good.

I had a couple of St Mirren fans as colleagues around his time in Paisley.

 

Curiously enough they generally cast admiring glances at our own Stephen Hughes when I cursed Dorman for another goal against us saying that Dorman was good an occasional spectacular goal but not a huge amount else in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...