Jump to content

2025/26 Ins & Outs Discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, robsterwood said:

So you contradicting your earlier point that every Motherwell signing is a gamble then? If Henry was so good 

Nope. Every signing is a gamble. Hendry was one that very much didn't work out.. 

I'm struggling to remember the last striker we signed where even before they kicked a ball, you felt certain they'd get goals and it actually came to pass. John Sutton? Tommy Coyne? People with a track record at our level, we don't often sign...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MelvinBragg said:

Nope. Every signing is a gamble. Hendry was one that very much didn't work out.. 

I'm struggling to remember the last striker we signed where even before they kicked a ball, you felt certain they'd get goals and it actually came to pass. John Sutton? Tommy Coyne? People with a track record at our level, we don't often sign...

I agree every signing is a gamble. So all any Club can do is minimise the chances of failure. But I think in this case it was as close as you are going to get to guaranteeing success. I think there is no similarity in any way to the Hendry signing or the risk attached.

With Biereth we signed a player who not only scored goals but was physically suited to the Scottish game.....as demonstrated in his first appearance (I think) when as a sub he bullied us into a home win over Hibs. I think that lack of physicality and determination is what Hendry was lacking, We did not discover those negatives until the deal was done. .So score one for lessening the risk factor re Biereth. He was suited to our game and had the correct mentality..

Arsenal were adamant Biereth was not for sale as he was viewed as one for their future. Just not right then. Spurs wanted shot of Hendry.  Another plus point on the Biereth risk assessment. For once the hype of 'Even short term, we are fortunate to get a player of this calibre' was pretty accurate. Clearly when he did well for us and in Austria, the offer of a few million up front was something Arsenal saw as too good to miss given he still had no route into their first team. A big mistake by them as it turned out. 

No injury record of note or a rehabilitation/career rebuild  in mind. Not a player looking to top up his pension. Like so many we have taken a much greater risk with. Now referred to as 'The Kettlewell Signing Policy'. 

Biereth was a Loan deal (sadly). Risk minimised. We had an out if it was a disaster. Unlike Henry who we signed on a permanent deal.......for £200k?

So, in respect of signing a youngster whether permanently or on Loan, I think the Biereth deal was as guaranteed as any Club could hope for. We were fortunate to get him but it was not luck that it worked out as well as it did. Just all too brief a stay sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dennyc said:

I agree every signing is a gamble. So all any Club can do is minimise the chances of failure. But I think in this case it was as close as you are going to get to guaranteeing success. I think there is no similarity in any way to the Hendry signing or the risk attached.

With Biereth we signed a player who not only scored goals but was physically suited to the Scottish game.....as demonstrated in his first appearance (I think) when as a sub he bullied us into a home win over Hibs. I think that lack of physicality and determination is what Hendry was lacking, We did not discover those negatives until the deal was done. .So score one for lessening the risk factor re Biereth. He was suited to our game and had the correct mentality..

Arsenal were adamant Biereth was not for sale as he was viewed as one for their future. Just not right then. Spurs wanted shot of Hendry.  Another plus point on the Biereth risk assessment. For once the hype of 'Even short term, we are fortunate to get a player of this calibre' was pretty accurate. Clearly when he did well for us and in Austria, the offer of a few million up front was something Arsenal saw as too good to miss given he still had no route into their first team. A big mistake by them as it turned out. 

No injury record of note or a rehabilitation/career rebuild  in mind. Not a player looking to top up his pension. Like so many we have taken a much greater risk with. Now referred to as 'The Kettlewell Signing Policy'. 

Biereth was a Loan deal (sadly). Risk minimised. We had an out if it was a disaster. Unlike Henry who we signed on a permanent deal.......for £200k?

So, in respect of signing a youngster whether permanently or on Loan, I think the Biereth deal was as guaranteed as any Club could hope for. We were fortunate to get him but it was not luck that it worked out as well as it did. Just all too brief a stay sadly.

Good post and yip Hendry was £200k, still not near the £350k mcleish paid for Shaun mcskimming 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Well Well said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A new face is in the building 🧐 <a href="https://t.co/OG11oUM8qe">pic.twitter.com/OG11oUM8qe</a></p>&mdash; Motherwell FC (@MotherwellFC) <a href="https://twitter.com/MotherwellFC/status/1942232134204510338?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 7, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

That will be the boy from West Brom on loan, highly rated apparently here's hoping he does well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kmcalpin said:

A much needed reinforcement  before Saturday. All we need now is a physical target man to play with him or Ap Stam.  

Hopefully the big boy fae Copenhagens reserves isnt just a rumour. He looks pretty tasty for our level.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weeyin said:

Short sighted means you can read close up. No big text necessary.

Just sayin' 

Short sighted means you have to read close up - so big text absolutely necessary - thank goodness for contact lenses that's all I'll say 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, wellgirl said:

Short sighted means you have to read close up - so big text absolutely necessary - thank goodness for contact lenses that's all I'll say 

Short sighted means your close up vision is good. I can speak from experience of being short sighted and always taking my glasses off to read (because my close up vision is perfect).

If it's further away I need bigger text, but I don't read websites from further away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weeyin said:

Short sighted means your close up vision is good. I can speak from ex perience of being short sighted and always taking my glasses off to read (because my close up vision is perfect).

If it's further away I need bigger text, but I don't read websites from further away.

Im short sighted in one eye and long in the other. But my long sighted eye is lazy so even though I have vision out of it it's useless 

Yeah I get what you mean - my close up vision is shite but that's only because of how short sighted I am if that makes sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, texanwellfan said:

I missed that “rumour”??

Came from a fake account looking for clicks. But he is the kind of player we would like to sign and he is a Copenhagen player.....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...