He was greetin' about the grass at Hampden and the physicality of the players when Scotland beat Spain.
He wouldn't last 2 minutes in an away game at Livi.
100%
There's still a long way to go, but I'd much rather watch our defence make 3 or 4 passes along the back looking for an opening than watch Casey hoof a hopeful long ball over AP's head.
More load balancing, bit more progression in our tactics and play, AP scores, clean sheet, top of the group.
Now for fun, scroll back through the thread to read the complaints.
Sometimes it's just a bad fit. Classic example for Hearts was John Sutton. Good with us, struggled at Hearts and then came back to Fir Park for a 22 goal season.
The seeding in this competition has been a bit of a joke in recent years, so not too bothered about that.
Would like to win the group, though, and keep progressing on the park.
I voted for the keeper.
I know he has had little to do in the past 2 games, but other than the poor pass against Peterhead (which he redeemed with a good save), he has looked confident and 100% on board with the new strategy.
Playing regularly on loan certainly doesn't hurt in that position compared to sitting on the bench for 2 years.
Being an academy product might add to my bias.
I think we're still at the stage where players are thinking about the new tactics, instead of being more instinctive - and that cause some of the runs and passes to be slightly late.
Agree about the crosses, though - quality has been poor overall.
Looking forward to this one and how we play against a team that, presumably, will want to come forward more often.
More space to attack, more defensive bombscares, or a bit of both?