weeyin

The club typically doesn't go out of it's way to confirm anything. Ojamaa, Anier and even Erwin fees were all kept quiet. However, at fan and Well Society Q & As they will normally give some sort of confirmation. I'm pretty confident we'd have a number of add-ons in there though, as it is standard practice and something we have done as far back as the McFadden deal.

As if I wasn't doing badly enough in the league, I also forgot.

It is, but it's pretty meaningless if you don't take into account the oppositon, who else was present/absent in the team at the time. And he was part of the team that rolled over to Accies, Thistle and St, Mirren at the end of last season. Not saying that was his fault, or that he's not an important player - just that pulling out win % for a team based on a single player is too simplistic.

And in our case, we got the best value from players like Porter, Ojamaa, Anier - all from other clubs.

Aye, sounds terrible. Glad we punted him before anybody offered us 2 million. Would have been an embarrassment accepting that kind of offer.

Don't bite. He just looks to see who everyone else thought had a decent game and takes the opposite point of view. Remember, this is the guy who spent months trying to convince us Higdon was mince.

You can say that again, but sadly par for the course. Most weeks there were a number of posts on here of the "hides in games" and "too lightweight" category. Seems like the best way for one of players to get credit is to leave.

It's amazing how inflated the prices are down south. If we had managed to get that for him, we could have paid Les back in a single shot and still had a few quid left over.

I'd rather have an average right footed player at right back than a good left footed player. It causes too many problems as they instinctively drift out of position and struggle to pass a ball up the line with their wrong foot. It's one of the reasons we struggled when Hammell was out and kept slotting in righties. Of course, ideally, I'd prefer an excellent right footed player at right back.

The owner's approach is to bring in some promising youngsters (for a relatively small fee) with the aim to sell them on for a profit. While the initial outlay is slightly larger, to me that is a more sustainable business model than bringing in players of free transfers and then releasing them free 2 years later.

People that know about these things (like Alex Ferguson) say it takes 2 years to build a team. Arsene Wenger says when it a player changes leagues, it takes 6 months for them to adapt. Forget last January's necessary, but short term buying - this is the start of the rebuilding. It's been 3 games.

Folks are probably bored with me repeating myself, but I did think Taylor was a gamble fitness (and match-fitness) wise for a high tempo debute at Tynecastle. I thought he'd have been better served with a run out in the U20s for a game or two - but maybe, like Long, we promised him game time.

Madness,

I think it's fair to say that even when we were challenging for the top 3 we were pretty inconsistent. Last time we finished 2nd we had had the least number of draws in the league. It was win our bust - fortunately we managed to keep scoring goals.

I'm willing to give our biggest wage the benefit of the doubt for a few weeks given that he missed the pre-season and is having to learn to link with our new signings. As much as Skippy helped Erwin last season (and seemed like a lot), I think Big Lee helped Skippy's game too. Of course, he was also playing higher up the park last season, which helped.

1st season in SPL, 9th out of 10 (saved by reconstruction) 2nd season in SPL, 8th out of 12 3rd season in SPL, 8th out of 12 4th season in SPL, 9th out of 10 (only bottom team relegated that season) 5th season in SPL, 6th out of 10 That was the initial SPL record of Wee Tommy (who many posters on here saw as our saviour after McCall left). Imagine how long he'd last now with the same stats.

Football, eh? Bloody hell.

Presuambly because we didn't have Chalmers and Pearson in the midfield.

Aye, we have new players to bed in plus a tough start to the season. Way too soon to start hitting the panic button - although no doubt we'll see plenty of that on here in the next few weeks. I would have been delighted with 6pts from the first 4 games, but won't be starting to make any kind of judgement until the first round of fixtures has been completed. Forget last season when we had to pull in all those players just for numbers. We are rebuilding this season and anything around mid-table will be a success. Still wouldn't have started Taylor tonight, though.

Too early in the season to make judgements. With Fletcher, Moult, Ripley and Taylor bedding in and Skippy missing a preseason, it's always going to take a few weeks at best for the team to take shape. I still wouldn't have thrown Taylor into this particular game though. At least guys like Leitch and Chalmers are up to SPFL speed.

A Tyncastle debut for a new signing who might not even be match fit yet maybe a bad idea?

All I said was I don't know if Taylor should start at Tynecastle the day after he signed. No doubt he'll get plenty of game time (assuming he performs for us). Although if we sign another midfielder like Baraclough was hinting, someone will be disappointed every week.

It wasn't his inujry problems that made him bad mouth every team he played for.

If he's crap, we can blame Tom Hateley for telling him what a great club we are.

Giving Taylor a few days to settle in and get used to his new teammates is hardly sentimental. Maybe everyone on here has seen him perform well already this season. I suspect he's not match fit and will need a game or two to find his feet. If he plays from the start, more power to him.