cambo97

I've read this today, if that was part of the proposals no wonder they knocked it back. 11-1 vote is bad enough but 41-1 is mental.

Not quite true, you would be automatically suspended for the next game in that tournament unless it is a straight red for violent conduct, then it is for the next game no matter the tournament.

Personally I think the 93-94 team that finished 3rd was better than both.

Reading Stewart Gilmour's comments yesterday it the proposals not only retained the 11-1 voting but also guaranteed that they couldn't be changed for 3 years.

There is an awful lot of people making predictions for a game which is alleged to have taken place 4 weeks ago!! "Motherwell Vs St.mirren... Match Thread, 06/03/13"

There is still 4 teams that can get the 6th spot, so it's hardly all but confirmed.

Not it's not, the colt clubs will be allowed promotion but not into the league their real team is until they leave Scotland then they can go right up to the top. So it could affect the SPL teams as well. It's a decision for the whole of Scottish football.

In 2010/2011 Inverness in 7th finished on more points than the Kilmarnock in 5th and us in 6th. This season could actually see the team in 10th having more points than the team finishing 6th (or higher). Edit: checking back in 2005/2006 it seems that ICT (again) in 7th had more points than the 4th placed team.

I may be giving Doncaster and the SPL too much credit, but I think the ridiculous league structure may be a deliberate ploy to scupper the other more important issues which are also on the table. When it gets to the vote they will then say they've listened to the fans, that way the SPL and the financial structure stays as is.

You could have saved yourself a lot of typing and just said - "The media should decide which cases should be reviewed" It wasn't clear cut at the first, second or third viewing but Andy Wanker made a big deal out of it and mentioned it every 5 minutes. A couple of Rangers fans the other day were trying to bait me by saying what a thug Randolph was and how there was no way he could be defended, I just said you're right but goalkeepers get away with far too much anyway; to which one of them said it was exactly the same as the challenges Alan McGregor made every game without any punishment.

Not quite, it's a registration ban which finishes the day after the summer transfer window closes. Sevco would then be able to register free agents from that date onwards.

Only subs they made that night were Kevin McBride for Riordan at 6-3 and Benjelloun for Stokes at 6-5.

Donations are not liable for VAT anyway, so the whole debate you started was pointless. There may be other tax liabilities involved but not VAT.

Then everyone cashes in their vouchers and pays £5 to get in, so gets paid £15 to watch the game.

I must be in the minority of one. I hate the large concourse at the front accessing the seats at Livi's ground. I much prefer an access similar to the Cooper or South stand. Why didn't you use Fir Park as the example?

What was the score with Stelrad, I seem to remember them as a sponsor at one point, probably before Scottish Brewers.

I'm sure it's only if they are free agents when the transfer window closes. Bob Malcolm was another who was signed outwith the window.

It was Odense I ended up with two seats right in the middle of the lower section. Ideal to see Murphy's penalty.

Airdrie Utd, Cowdenbeath, Stenhousemuir

If you listen to Doncater that's the number of professional teams that will be left in two years anyway.

The rules haven't actually been changed yet but were proposed to ensure the transfer of share to the newco, which would have have only advantaged newco. But you know that; the rule changes were all about helping Sevco gaining immediate membership of the SPL; BUT the oldRangers fans and the media made out it was just to punish them so it had to be shelved. If they had shut up and allowed the changes through this argument would not be happening Sevco would be playing in the SPL next season with a points and financial deduction,

Don't blame you but as I make out, Green has already agreed a price of £5.3M for the assets including Ibrox, Murray Park and the car park. He seems to think that he will also get the players but that looks doubtful. Like you I would have thought the the liquidators would jump in and halt this, especially as Dumb and Dumber knocked back a bid of £3M for Naismith alone. Don't know how it works but I would have thought that the oldco could still retain the players contracts and could sell them on right up until the company is wound up.

It can happen any time. The Newco will buy the assets then apply for the licence to be transferred prior to the oldco being fully liquidated.