Jump to content

2024/25 Ins & Outs Discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Onthefringes said:

When it’s been spelled out for years in club accounts that fees are accrued over the length of contracts….

Aye, well done you for a couple of likes.

So thats what - 25-33% upfront. 33% of £4mill still gives us a decent amount to work with to reshape the squad in addition to leveraging future deals through guaranteed income over the next 3 years.

But you knew that too. :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm  a bit sceptical how much would even go to players.

Think a load will go on infrastructure etc.

We're not really going to be breaking our wage structure or paying much more than we already to.

To do that we need a sustained increase in income.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Big Stall said:

So thats what - 25-33% upfront. 33% of £4mill still gives us a decent amount to work with to reshape the squad in addition to leveraging future deals through guaranteed income over the next 3 years.

But you knew that too. :)

Wouldn’t that be a great thought.  Even better if longer term sustainability and infrastructure weren’t a thing also.

But you knew that too 🥱

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Onthefringes said:

Wouldn’t that be a great thought.  Even better if longer term sustainability and infrastructure weren’t a thing also.

But you knew that too 🥱

Which generally has to be found with or without Millers sale - certainly the crucial parts. That revenue will just help us not be as impovrished, whether we recieved it in one lump or over a series of instalments. Its good that we both know these things

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll only be signing a Goalkeeper as back up to Balcombe until Ox is back and to allow Connoly to go back to EK and play. Mair broke his finger I believe so he'll be going back to Norwich.

Don't see us bringing else in other than that.

Can't understand why we've kept Taveres at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Onthefringes said:

🤔 How much of a transfer fee do you think is paid up front? 

OTF

I was speaking to nesbits agent b4 he went to millwall n he was telling me they only paid a % up front so it wouldnt alter millwalls tax etc 

dont know how much of it is true but he came to see me bout something else n we got talking bout it 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big Stall said:

Which generally has to be found with or without Millers sale - certainly the crucial parts. That revenue will just help us not be as impovrished, whether we recieved it in one lump or over a series of instalments. Its good that we both know these things

Fair point well made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, smiddy said:

OTF

I was speaking to nesbits agent b4 he went to millwall n he was telling me they only paid a % up front so it wouldnt alter millwalls tax etc 

dont know how much of it is true but he came to see me bout something else n we got talking bout it 👍

Believe to be the standard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kmcalpin said:

I'm surprised that Matty Connelly was given a new 12 month deal last summer,but isn't considered good enough to be our No 2, only 6 months later. 

Is it a case, of he's better off getting games chasing the lowland league title with EK as opposed to sitting on his arse, bored to tears watching us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is some of that not covered by insurance for injured players? Also, I'd assume loans are cheaper than full time transfers. So, it ls not ideal ans no doubt costs us more than we'd like, but probably not at blowing our budget levels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spit_It_Out said:

Honestly when you step back and look at how much money we have burned on players that's have gave us next to nothing last 6 months it's shocking.

 Don't want to hear tight budget,3rd smallest budget in the league bs ever again.

We can look forward to the new manager regularly bemoaning the need for cost cutting to address the unintended overspend under the previous regime…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fizoxy said:

Is some of that not covered by insurance for injured players? Also, I'd assume loans are cheaper than full time transfers. So, it ls not ideal ans no doubt costs us more than we'd like, but probably not at blowing our budget levels. 

I wouldn't assume that lads coming to us on loan from Man City or Palace would be particularly cheap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Spit_It_Out said:

Honestly when you step back and look at how much money we have burned on players that's have gave us next to nothing last 6 months it's shocking.

 Don't want to hear tight budget,3rd smallest budget in the league bs ever again.

So we've probably had to go over budget to cover for injured players and you think that means....what exactly?

The money will come out of next couple of annual budgets or be paid for by Lennon Miller.

It definately doesn't mean we've magically got more money to spend.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt if the bloated squad will cost us that more. Say we're 7 players up on  our normal squad. Average pay £1,250 pw for say 5 months. That might cost us an extra £180,000 - £200,000. Not a fortune in the great scheme of things. That's a very rough estimate of course. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • David locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...