Onthefringes

Believe to be the standard.

Fair point well made.

Wouldn’t that be a great thought. Even better if longer term sustainability and infrastructure weren’t a thing also. But you knew that too 🥱

When it’s been spelled out for years in club accounts that fees are accrued over the length of contracts…. Aye, well done you for a couple of likes.

Kind of difficult when you’ve loaned them out to aid their development.

🤔 How much of a transfer fee do you think is paid up front?

Eh? Read what was posted and not just look at the words? Paying a relative hefty fee for the Australian and developing academy prospects goes against your “They have instigated a plan which is to bring in players from the depths of English football. Not once have they looked at the top 4 teams in the Scottish Championship.”

Valid points with merit until your take on recruitment. It’s simple logistics, the value just isn’t there despite some undoubted talent. Inflated transfer or costly development fees in a flawed system or priced out of securing pre-contracts - take your pick. Where does the Stamatelopoulos acquisition or development of academy prospects fit into your thinking?

Word salad. I was being descriptive on an observation. As for the Well Bois comment - on a Stewart Kettlewell discussion thread? An irrelevance much like yourself. I’ve defended them, not once have I said they never put a foot wrong. For the record, I’ll wager you know nothing of the Well Bois given the make up of those who frequent that area of the stadium. Plenty of your musings on what’s an emotive subject this week are exactly that - inane. An understanding of dressing room politics and doubling down as you refuse to believe is lacking sense or meaning. All in the schooling I suppose. At no point did I mention your opinion isn’t welcome. Playing victim card once again - no bother.

You would 🙄 Inane.

My old fella still blames Davie Hay for the decision. Loathed as much as the rotund cheat Derek Johnstone.

Committed to season long loans as having played for parent clubs can’t feature for others…

👍 Always next year

Doesn’t matter how many times you type same, there’s still a flaw to your argument… Celtic (4) were drawn at home to ball (13) not ball (12) Yeah, quite simple.

😂 The end.

Except Queens spark weren’t number 16…

Rangers would’ve been another number?

Sure, you’ll be first on here to post about it you anal retentive.

Scunnered.

Honestly? I’ll you and your ilk denigrate another thread. Some of us will rejoice in our 6th win in 7.

Here we go again 🙄 For the record, I don’t have to.

Behave. Win 2-1 away from home & that’s what you post. Deary me. Certainly wasn’t the case.

Wanting to relocate is way different to medium to long term planning to relocate. Admirable production and well researched by Mr Cameron and of interest to many. It’s a subject that’s been done to death on here though and nothing new offered by parochial thinking. Currently not viable, funding isn’t available. That’s accepted - I’d wager that’s the outlook being taken by our CEO rather than a flat ‘no’ to any move. Did he offer opinion on the fanciful notion of developing current home? if it hadn’t been for the financial collapse in 2008, I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to think we’d already be part of a wider development before now as would Motherwell Town Centre.

Always seen that area as the main car park which runs the length from Lesser Hampden towards South East and Aitkenhead Road. Usually only by arrangement and dependant on what area of the ground you’re allocated. Club buses were split on last visit and we were parked around Queens Park/Battlefield Road and others were outside Hampden. I’ll see how it goes.

Are the buses sure to be parked in Hampden’s car park?