Onthefringes

Walking, talking contradiction. Apt

Where to even start on the dribbling above? It was one and one only who wasn’t in the country… As for innocent, charges have been dropped and football banning orders were rescinded yesterday as it happens. Repeated similar stance? Someone in the know? What are you on about if you’re not venting? No contacts needed, the information is there and you don’t have to scrape the surface by much to corroborate, to be factual and find informed opinion. As for your closing gambit, above point stands. Where was any claim proven to be untrue? Using the simple theories that are de rigueur of some on here the ex-copper allowed box loads of A4 paper to be admitted into the away stand and would have seen these being placed by individuals across seating without challenge. All the while denying those in our own support of doing similar.. See you when next issue arises.

Again, point proven. Definitely merit in most of your posts. Perception(s) skew the balance you claim not to see on this subject.

You can ask 10 persons in any event described and likely receive 10 different versions. Don't see many denying any of the going ons, but, the perception of some is far and away from the reality what has happened in many cases.

I concur.

Would be. Personally think any relationship will always be fraught as any indiscretion no matter the severity is jumped upon by the usual suspects who (and we know many have a hotline to Park) have the added measure of a QR code now. Society have a big challenge in uniting our support as a whole.

These discussions have been happening for over a decade! Problem is someone has the ear of those with influence in the club and those same people won’t rock the boat.

Point proved. You’re a nonsense. I ain’t buying the mistaken identity given who made the error. The images pushed by the authorities and national press were so far removed from the kid it wasn’t even close. Generational was not aimed at any with any family connection - more that the movement’s come in cycles. This ultra phenomenon is a world away from my generation, for example. The unfortunate claim was nothing to do with those wanting to be involved. Carry on that tangent, offers nothing in the debate.

How very apt. Where in your narrative does the passing of identity and personal information to Police Scotland by a club employee of a kid who was proven to be out of the country at the time of an alleged incident? Unnecessary and not isolated. Nobody anywhere has stated those involved to be a special case, not ever. Unsavoury incidents and crowd behaviours have been part and parcel of the game long before I arrived and will be long after I’ve gone. It’s generational and oft fuelled by societal problems. Most just see it for what it is and have grown to know football is a lot safer place to attend given the groups tend to face similar away from matches and it’s a revenue stream for authorities. Unfortunately, some wishing not to be involved get caught up in any event though rare. Let’s not be pretending we haven’t moved on from the dark days of 70’s to mid 80’s.

Same posters, same false narrative. For those who understand no explanation is necessary. For those who don’t no explanation will suffice.

See above. Interpretation of alleged SPFL ‘rules’ which haven’t been breached according to the legal advice of the law practice with the highest success rate in quashing football convictions - young ‘uns have met them as a group recently… Maybe for another debate, Club can preach about ‘community’ and growing the fanbase. Many (involved and not) feel it’s lip service.

Different to what you claimed earlier. That’s a fact.

Not that I’m aware of.

At least keep to the facts. Most have been back in since with no issue.

Off on a tangent. Again. Not the same events. Similar issue, latest ‘unacceptable conduct’ signage the brainchild of our CEO so box ticked as he ‘did it at Shrewsbury’. Having heard versions from both sides it looks like a certain club employee who’s had carte blanche has tied up our CEO in knots and they’re hiding behind their interpretation of a ‘SPFL ruling’. Nobody has been cited in a court of law nor subject to football banning order under current legislation. Personally think the statement they should make is deliver another food bank drive as planned tomorrow and not enter the ground rather than offer posts on social media platforms. Certainly offer different opinion to those who just point, snigger and claim it’s “woah, look at me”.

Been in the building for a while. Training facilities courtesy of his friendship with Halliday

Cynical maybe, eyes on the bigger prize? Co-opted onto Executive board.

🤔 Suppose it’ll depend on who you listen to… Was done to death on here some time ago. Watt was told he could move the summer previous then enjoyed his purple patch.

Reaching out to most, if not all. And whilst this will add some to the board, I believe there’s plans to co-opt after the election when skill gaps are identified.

For me, the most important thing following election regardless of who gets in, is making sure those who put their name forward still contribute afterwards in some way or form?

Poor kid will never learn

Another belter from you. Robbie Crawford kept him out the team long after Slattery signed. Let that sink in.

First prize £200 303930 Secobd prize £75 303910

It’s awful. I’m all for the main colour, but, don’t get the need for the tartan trim.

I concur. For those dismissive, go and scratch the surface and you’ll find there’s a world of difference to your outlook.