Onthefringes

Eh? Read what was posted and not just look at the words? Paying a relative hefty fee for the Australian and developing academy prospects goes against your “They have instigated a plan which is to bring in players from the depths of English football. Not once have they looked at the top 4 teams in the Scottish Championship.”

Valid points with merit until your take on recruitment. It’s simple logistics, the value just isn’t there despite some undoubted talent. Inflated transfer or costly development fees in a flawed system or priced out of securing pre-contracts - take your pick. Where does the Stamatelopoulos acquisition or development of academy prospects fit into your thinking?

Word salad. I was being descriptive on an observation. As for the Well Bois comment - on a Stewart Kettlewell discussion thread? An irrelevance much like yourself. I’ve defended them, not once have I said they never put a foot wrong. For the record, I’ll wager you know nothing of the Well Bois given the make up of those who frequent that area of the stadium. Plenty of your musings on what’s an emotive subject this week are exactly that - inane. An understanding of dressing room politics and doubling down as you refuse to believe is lacking sense or meaning. All in the schooling I suppose. At no point did I mention your opinion isn’t welcome. Playing victim card once again - no bother.

You would 🙄 Inane.

My old fella still blames Davie Hay for the decision. Loathed as much as the rotund cheat Derek Johnstone.

Committed to season long loans as having played for parent clubs can’t feature for others…

👍 Always next year

Doesn’t matter how many times you type same, there’s still a flaw to your argument… Celtic (4) were drawn at home to ball (13) not ball (12) Yeah, quite simple.

😂 The end.

Except Queens spark weren’t number 16…

Rangers would’ve been another number?

Sure, you’ll be first on here to post about it you anal retentive.

Scunnered.

Honestly? I’ll you and your ilk denigrate another thread. Some of us will rejoice in our 6th win in 7.

Here we go again 🙄 For the record, I don’t have to.

Behave. Win 2-1 away from home & that’s what you post. Deary me. Certainly wasn’t the case.

Wanting to relocate is way different to medium to long term planning to relocate. Admirable production and well researched by Mr Cameron and of interest to many. It’s a subject that’s been done to death on here though and nothing new offered by parochial thinking. Currently not viable, funding isn’t available. That’s accepted - I’d wager that’s the outlook being taken by our CEO rather than a flat ‘no’ to any move. Did he offer opinion on the fanciful notion of developing current home? if it hadn’t been for the financial collapse in 2008, I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to think we’d already be part of a wider development before now as would Motherwell Town Centre.

Always seen that area as the main car park which runs the length from Lesser Hampden towards South East and Aitkenhead Road. Usually only by arrangement and dependant on what area of the ground you’re allocated. Club buses were split on last visit and we were parked around Queens Park/Battlefield Road and others were outside Hampden. I’ll see how it goes.

Are the buses sure to be parked in Hampden’s car park?

Casey wasn’t sent off for denying a certain goal. Butland’s positioning counts for nothing when both offences deny a clear goalscoring opportunity… consistency is key.

Rinse. Repeat 🙄

That’s the crux. Point in the direction ‘told that it didn’t happen’…. And ‘saw it with their own eyes’ doesn’t always give a full picture. That’s reason for little balance between some posts. O’Donnell incident was done to death real time - the drink wasn’t thrown directly at him. Poor aim granted*, it was thrown at much maligned group who stood basically pitchside spoiling views of others. Player himself recognised that at a later date. *Thats not to condone, nor play down.

He’ll always be defined by that quote. Had built a fairly strong team on little budget last season prior to returning North. Definitely better than County the twice I seen them. Club ownership problems deepened and that little budget has decreased and the basket case looks like taking them to Conference at best.

What purpose does it serve? Going over old ground, information sometimes comes from a position of trust. Doubt I’d be the only who wouldn’t just repeat to appease others who don’t wish to seek and find for themselves. Then you set off on a tangent… the topic isn’t about me. I could discuss biology in one part, your mask just slips on the second. We see you.

Placation. No denial incidents don’t take place. Answering yes, I justifiably play them down. It’s a world away from condoning behaviours. Precursors have been stated over many threads and I fail to see the benefit of repeat. It certainly won’t change the viewpoint of those who refuse to look at the bigger picture..